[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":208},["ShallowReactive",2],{"project-11431095":3},{"id":4,"name":5,"line":6,"line_source":7,"title":8,"url":9,"domain":10,"maker":11,"posted_at":12,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rank_in_year":16,"shown_in_year":17,"top":18,"tier":19,"category":20,"subcategory":21,"format":22,"keywords":23,"reception":28,"sentiment":29,"stance_mix":30,"scored_comments":35,"aspects":36,"strip":44,"post_text":45,"what":46,"said":55,"maker_in_thread":136,"shape":138,"grid":141,"attempts":172,"same_week":173,"maker_shows":38,"maker_hidden":201,"reader_version":202,"card":203},"11431095","pageweight","A tool to measure how responsive images benefit your page weight","title","Show HN: A tool to measure how responsive images benefit your page weight","https:\u002F\u002Fpageweight.imgix.com\u002F","pageweight.imgix.com","zacman85",1459869993,2016,45,12,789,2264,35,"shown","dev_tools","web performance audit","web_app",[24,25,26,27],"responsive images","page weight","image optimization","webp","mixed",-0.28,{"positive":31,"neutral":32,"mixed":33,"critical":34},2,4,0,5,11,{"execution":37,"design":39,"performance":41,"idea":42,"privacy":43},{"positive":33,"critical":38},3,{"positive":40,"critical":33},1,{"positive":33,"critical":40},{"positive":33,"critical":40},{"positive":33,"critical":33},[38,40,40,38,34,38,33,40,40,40,34,38],null,{"problem":47,"audience":45,"pricing":45,"motivation":45,"time_to_build":45,"stack":53,"openness":54,"stage":54,"team_size":54},{"value":48,"source":49,"evidence":50},"Measuring how much responsive images would reduce a page's weight.","inferred",[51],{"id":52},"post",[],"unknown",{"praise":56,"objections":69,"requests":99,"questions":115,"alternatives":124},[57],{"value":58,"source":59,"evidence":60},"Useful tool, bookmarked and impressed by share image previews","commenter",[61,65],{"id":62,"by":63,"text":64},"11435047","ColCh","Pretty nice tool BTW. I've bookmarked this link",{"id":66,"by":67,"text":68},"11435335","arcameron","I posted one of your share links into our Slack, and was really impressed with the image it found (your `meta property=\"og:image\"`) & attached in the rich snippet! Nice work!",[70,85,92],{"value":71,"source":59,"evidence":72},"Jobs frequently fail or stop partway on many pages",[73,77,81],{"id":74,"by":75,"text":76},"11437075","3dfan","Tried it with a few pages. Not a single one worked. Either it just stopped at some number like \"258\u002F290 images\" or it gave me \"There was an error processing ... Please try…",{"id":78,"by":79,"text":80},"11435080","ameesdotme","https:\u002F\u002Fpageweight.imgix.com\u002Fjobs\u002F01aece6b-48a4-47bd-843a-bf89c954c4ae Broke it",{"id":82,"by":83,"text":84},"11441884","x13","didn't work on two https site I tried...",{"value":86,"source":59,"evidence":87},"Does not work well for lazy or JavaScript-loaded images",[88],{"id":89,"by":90,"text":91},"11437093","NicoJuicy","I have multiple images loaded through javascript. Any thoughts on how these could be included? https:\u002F\u002Fpageweight.imgix.com\u002Fjobs\u002Faaa64e22-5ce8-48ae-905c-7efd4a10720b\u002Floading",{"value":93,"source":59,"evidence":94},"Compression differences are noticeable on retina screens",[95],{"id":96,"by":97,"text":98},"11436416","stevenhubertron","Even on the highest setting the difference is noticeable enough on a retina screen that I couldn't use this tool. Especially when imageOptim does such a good job. Cool concept…",[100,104,108],{"value":101,"source":59,"evidence":102},"Support for JavaScript-loaded images",[103],{"id":89,"by":90,"text":91},{"value":105,"source":59,"evidence":106},"More compression options",[107],{"id":96,"by":97,"text":98},{"value":109,"source":59,"evidence":110},"Clearer error explanations",[111],{"id":112,"by":113,"text":114},"11436534","dedalus","Does this work even if you have webp? Can you explain the errors in more detail. e.g : http:\u002F\u002Fpageweight.imgix.com\u002Fjobs\u002Ffb65b0e2-c316-4555-8eef-638743512af5 is what I got but not…",[116,120],{"value":117,"source":59,"evidence":118},"Does it work with WebP images?",[119],{"id":112,"by":113,"text":114},{"value":121,"source":59,"evidence":122},"Does it support HTTPS sites?",[123],{"id":82,"by":83,"text":84},[125,129],{"value":126,"source":59,"evidence":127},"imageOptim",[128],{"id":96,"by":97,"text":98},{"value":130,"source":59,"evidence":131},"imgix client libraries for device pixel ratio sizing",[132],{"id":133,"by":134,"text":135},"11436900","mrinterweb","Imgix has good libraries that can automatically determine client device pixel ratio and other factors that make it easy to request the right sized image per client. I don't work…",{"comments":33,"answered":33,"key":137},[],{"commenters":15,"max_depth":31,"maker_replies":33,"first_comment_mins":139,"lifespan_hours":140},397,29,[142,144,146,147,151,153,154,156,159,161,166,168],[112,33,38,143,113,33],"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fexecution",[74,40,40,145,75,33],"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fexecution",[78,31,40,145,79,33],[148,31,38,149,150,33],"11435151","maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone","kellysutton",[66,38,34,152,67,33],"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fdesign",[89,32,38,143,90,33],[133,34,33,155,134,33],"other\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[96,157,40,158,97,33],6,"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fperformance",[82,160,40,145,83,33],7,[162,163,40,164,165,33],"11434919",8,"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fidea","codingdave",[62,163,34,167,63,33],"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fnone",[169,163,38,170,171,33],"11436303","maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fprivacy","dang",[],[174,179,183,188,193,197],{"id":175,"name":176,"points":177,"category":178},"11407536","webkay",553,"security_privacy",{"id":180,"name":181,"points":182,"category":20},"11439879","Popper.js",169,{"id":184,"name":185,"points":186,"category":187},"11403930","Triangul-Art",138,"creative",{"id":189,"name":190,"points":191,"category":192},"11396345","Expounder",134,"languages",{"id":194,"name":195,"points":196,"category":20},"11423070","WrapAPI",111,{"id":198,"name":199,"points":200,"category":20},"11396702","tmux2html",99,false,"v2",{"id":204,"name":5,"line":6,"ai":201,"cat":20,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rec":28,"s":29,"top":18,"kw":205,"maker":11,"domain":10,"tier":19,"attempts":33,"strip":206,"url":9,"mix":207,"praise":58,"objection":71,"sub":21},11431095,[24,25,26,27],"311353011153",[31,32,33,34],1794036542976]