[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":322},["ShallowReactive",2],{"project-3229529":3},{"id":4,"name":5,"line":6,"line_source":7,"title":8,"url":9,"domain":10,"maker":11,"posted_at":12,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rank_in_year":16,"shown_in_year":17,"top":18,"tier":19,"category":20,"subcategory":21,"format":22,"keywords":23,"reception":28,"sentiment":29,"stance_mix":30,"scored_comments":35,"aspects":36,"strip":45,"post_text":46,"what":47,"said":67,"maker_in_thread":168,"shape":179,"grid":183,"attempts":285,"same_week":286,"maker_shows":40,"maker_hidden":315,"reader_version":316,"card":317},"3229529","Baby Name Graphs","My minimum viable side project","title","Show HN:  My minimum viable side project","http:\u002F\u002Fbabynamegraphs.com","babynamegraphs.com","phuff",1321148238,2011,46,38,268,1097,25,"shown","data","baby name popularity visualisation","web_app",[24,25,26,27],"baby names","name popularity","name trends","social security names","curious",-0.07,{"positive":31,"neutral":32,"mixed":33,"critical":34},3,12,2,5,22,{"execution":37,"idea":39,"privacy":41,"design":42,"docs":43,"performance":44},{"positive":38,"critical":33},0,{"positive":38,"critical":40},1,{"positive":38,"critical":40},{"positive":38,"critical":40},{"positive":38,"critical":38},{"positive":33,"critical":38},[38,38,38,31,40,40,38,31,31,38,38,38,38,40,38,31,38,31,38,31,38,31,38,31,34,31,34,31,38,31,40,40,31,38,34,31,31,38],null,{"problem":48,"audience":55,"pricing":46,"motivation":60,"time_to_build":46,"stack":64,"openness":65,"stage":66,"team_size":65},{"value":49,"source":50,"evidence":51},"Hard to compare popularity of baby names over time when choosing a name.","maker",[52],{"id":53,"by":11,"text":54},"3229999","Yeah, viable in this context means that you can graph names and there are ads on the page. All the times we've tried to look at names for popularity when naming our kids we…",{"value":56,"source":57,"evidence":58},"Parents choosing baby names.","inferred",[59],{"id":53,"by":11,"text":54},{"value":61,"source":50,"evidence":62},"Parents lacked simple visualization tools for name popularity when naming their kids.",[63],{"id":53,"by":11,"text":54},[],"unknown","launched",{"praise":68,"objections":81,"requests":108,"questions":135,"alternatives":147},[69],{"value":70,"source":71,"evidence":72},"Simple, effective design and clean use.","commenter",[73,77],{"id":74,"by":75,"text":76},"3229992","dylangs1030","Well the design is good, simple to use, and most important: effective. Unfortunately, unless you and I have a different definition of viable, this idea isn't very lucrative. I've…",{"id":78,"by":79,"text":80},"3230348","mtgentry","this is dope, nice work :)",[82,97,104],{"value":83,"source":71,"evidence":84},"Not viable as a product; similar tools already exist.",[85,89,93],{"id":86,"by":87,"text":88},"3229861","chancho","What exactly does \"viable\" mean in this context? Because the husband and wife team behind NameVoyager have had the baby name trend visualization market cornered for years now.…",{"id":90,"by":91,"text":92},"3230949","steve8918","Not to be too harsh, but I agree, this is hardly a \"viable\" product. It pretty much is a college-level assignment where you just graph data in a database. It's needs a lot more…",{"id":94,"by":95,"text":96},"3229845","tycho77","Sorry to be a downer, but Wolfram Alpha has beaten you to the punch: http:\u002F\u002Fwww.wolframalpha.com\u002Finput\u002F?i=Andrew",{"value":98,"source":71,"evidence":99},"Data covers US only and is not labelled as such.",[100],{"id":101,"by":102,"text":103},"3230495","jarofgreen","Would be good to have that clear on the website, that was my first Q. Cos I suspect from knowledge of my name and the lookup I just did on your site, the UK data looks very…",{"value":105,"source":71,"evidence":106},"Graphs break for names like David or Isabella; log scale suggested.",[107],{"id":90,"by":91,"text":92},[109,113,124],{"value":110,"source":71,"evidence":111},"Support non-US name data such as UK.",[112],{"id":101,"by":102,"text":103},{"value":114,"source":71,"evidence":115},"Fix iPad styling and drag\u002Fdouble-click interactions.",[116,120],{"id":117,"by":118,"text":119},"3230157","jshen","Styling is messed up on an iPad",{"id":121,"by":122,"text":123},"3230717","justincormack","Styling ok for me but the drag and double click actions dont work...",{"value":125,"source":71,"evidence":126},"Show gender-combined graphs and names missing from the data.",[127,131],{"id":128,"by":129,"text":130},"3230072","spacejunkie","Try this: http:\u002F\u002Fbabynamegraphs.com\u002Ffemale\u002FmultipleNamesGraph?names%5B%5D=mark and double click to show the \"all time\" graph. Note this shows _females_. And, of course, you have…",{"id":132,"by":133,"text":134},"3229842","tikhonj","My name (Tikhon) didn't even get a graph :( Probably because it's an exceptionally uncommon name (but not uncommon enough for me to get it as a username). In the list of names on…",[136],{"value":137,"source":71,"evidence":138},"What is the data source?",[139,143],{"id":140,"by":141,"text":142},"3230030","estel","Out of interest, what's the data source? US only?",{"id":144,"by":145,"text":146},"3230595","brador","What's the data source on that one? Is it a wiki scrape?",[148,152,160],{"value":149,"source":71,"evidence":150},"NameVoyager (babynamewizard.com)",[151],{"id":86,"by":87,"text":88},{"value":153,"source":71,"evidence":154},"Wolfram Alpha",[155,156],{"id":94,"by":95,"text":96},{"id":157,"by":158,"text":159},"3230167","xyzzyb","Of course there's always Wolfram|Alpha. http:\u002F\u002Fwww.wolframalpha.com\u002Finput\u002F?i=David%2C+John",{"value":161,"source":71,"evidence":162},"babynameclusters.com",[163,167],{"id":164,"by":165,"text":166},"3229857","brfox","Here's a website I made a few years ago: http:\u002F\u002Fwww.babynameclusters.com\u002Fname\u002FTristan\u002FMale That's a good guess regarding the Brad Pitt character. I should add movie character…",{"id":74,"by":75,"text":76},{"comments":169,"answered":170,"key":171},9,6,[172,173,176],{"id":53,"text":54},{"id":174,"text":175},"3230008","I agree with lemma, I think it's Freakonomics. I have some basic stats\u002Fother demo graphs that I think might be interesting. This kind of Celebrity type graphing would be fun,…",{"id":177,"text":178},"3240870","Thanks",{"commenters":180,"max_depth":31,"maker_replies":169,"first_comment_mins":181,"lifespan_hours":182},28,124,70,[184,186,188,190,194,196,198,201,205,209,212,214,215,219,223,224,227,230,232,235,238,240,243,246,247,252,255,258,262,264,268,270,271,273,275,278,283,284],[86,38,38,185,87,38],"commenter\u002Fneutral\u002Fidea",[53,38,38,187,11,40],"maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fidea",[157,38,38,189,158,38],"commenter\u002Fcritical\u002Fidea",[191,38,31,192,193,38],"3231462","maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone","Papirola",[90,38,40,195,91,38],"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fexecution",[94,40,40,197,95,38],"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fidea",[199,40,38,200,133,38],"3229858","commenter\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[202,40,31,203,204,38],"3230795","project\u002Fmixed\u002Fidea","jaynate",[206,33,31,207,208,38],"3229834","project\u002Fneutral\u002Fidea","pamelafox",[210,33,38,200,211,38],"3229975","lemma",[213,33,38,200,102,38],"3230492",[174,33,38,187,11,40],[216,33,38,217,218,38],"3230316","other\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone","personlurking",[220,31,40,221,222,38],"3230548","project\u002Fcritical\u002Fprivacy","JonathanBouman",[177,31,38,192,11,40],[128,225,31,226,129,38],4,"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fexecution",[228,225,38,229,11,40],"3230086","maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fdesign",[132,34,31,231,133,38],"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fdesign",[233,34,38,234,11,40],"3230001","maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fexecution",[236,170,31,231,237,38],"3229899","phzbOx",[239,170,38,229,11,40],"3230010",[140,241,31,242,141,38],7,"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fdocs",[244,241,38,245,11,40],"3230071","maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fdocs",[101,241,31,242,102,38],[248,249,34,250,251,38],"3230662",8,"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fperformance","philwelch",[253,169,31,207,254,38],"3230874","ajhai",[256,169,34,250,257,38],"3231080","rplnt",[259,260,31,231,261,38],"3229895",10,"eurleif",[263,260,38,229,11,40],"3230014",[265,266,31,207,267,38],"3230500",11,"mmacneil",[117,32,40,269,118,38],"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fdesign",[121,32,40,195,122,38],[74,272,31,203,75,38],13,[274,272,38,187,11,40],"3230075",[78,276,34,277,79,38],14,"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fnone",[279,280,31,281,282,38],"3229802",15,"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fperformance","thigbee",[164,280,31,207,165,38],[144,280,38,200,145,38],[],[287,292,297,302,307,311],{"id":288,"name":289,"points":290,"category":291},"3222334","Privacy Parrot",145,"security_privacy",{"id":293,"name":294,"points":295,"category":296},"3244623","Tunebox",131,"consumer_social",{"id":298,"name":299,"points":300,"category":301},"3245267","HourlyPuppy",118,"creative",{"id":303,"name":304,"points":305,"category":306},"3222253","instacss",90,"dev_tools",{"id":308,"name":309,"points":182,"category":310},"3221661","ClassPager","productivity",{"id":312,"name":313,"points":314,"category":296},"3218592","AppQuu",40,false,"v2",{"id":318,"name":5,"line":6,"ai":315,"cat":20,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rec":28,"s":29,"top":18,"kw":319,"maker":11,"domain":10,"tier":19,"attempts":38,"strip":320,"url":9,"mix":321,"praise":70,"objection":83,"sub":21},3229529,[24,25,26,27],"00031103300001030303030353530311305330",[31,32,33,34],1793990876528]