[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":133},["ShallowReactive",2],{"project-32339641":3},{"id":4,"name":5,"line":6,"line_source":7,"title":8,"url":9,"domain":10,"maker":11,"posted_at":12,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rank_in_year":16,"shown_in_year":17,"top":18,"tier":19,"category":20,"subcategory":21,"format":22,"keywords":23,"reception":28,"sentiment":29,"stance_mix":30,"scored_comments":34,"aspects":35,"strip":38,"post_text":29,"what":39,"said":43,"maker_in_thread":82,"shape":84,"grid":87,"attempts":97,"same_week":98,"maker_shows":125,"maker_hidden":126,"reader_version":127,"card":128},"32339641","ToolJet","Extensible OSS Retool Alternative","title","Show HN: Extensible OSS Retool Alternative","https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002FToolJet\u002FToolJet\u002Freleases\u002Ftag\u002Fv1.21.0","github.com","navaneethpk",1659590682,2022,31,5,1234,2570,49,"shown","dev_tools","internal tool builder","web_app",[24,25,26,27],"retool alternative","open source internal tools","low code builder","agpl","quiet",null,{"positive":31,"neutral":32,"mixed":32,"critical":33},1,0,2,3,{"idea":36,"pricing":37},{"positive":31,"critical":32},{"positive":32,"critical":33},[32,15,31,31,32],{"problem":29,"audience":29,"pricing":29,"motivation":29,"time_to_build":29,"stack":40,"openness":41,"stage":42,"team_size":42},[],"open_source","unknown",{"praise":44,"objections":53,"requests":65,"questions":66,"alternatives":74},[45],{"value":46,"source":47,"evidence":48},"Welcome an open source alternative for internal tooling","commenter",[49],{"id":50,"by":51,"text":52},"32340854","tarunmuvvala","Love that there is an alternative OSS for internal tooling. As a PM , I totally underappreciate the power of these tools in streamlining the workflows across the org.",[54],{"value":55,"source":47,"evidence":56},"AGPL license seen as a downside, feels like trialware to some",[57,61],{"id":58,"by":59,"text":60},"32340832","17120","AGPL definitely is a downside!",{"id":62,"by":63,"text":64},"32361048","jcwayne","I'm sure it's not a popular opinion, but I consider AGPL to be more source-available trialware than OSS. Even for strictly internal tooling, I hesitate to use AGPL licensed code.",[],[67],{"value":68,"source":47,"evidence":69},"Why is AGPL considered not truly open source?",[70],{"id":71,"by":72,"text":73},"32367493","remram","Why is that?",[75],{"value":76,"source":47,"evidence":77},"AppSmith",[78],{"id":79,"by":80,"text":81},"32342188","snehesht","AppSmith (https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fappsmithorg\u002Fappsmith) is good one as well.",{"comments":32,"answered":32,"key":83},[],{"commenters":15,"max_depth":34,"maker_replies":32,"first_comment_mins":85,"lifespan_hours":86},233,55,[88,90,92,94,95],[79,32,32,89,80,32],"other\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[50,31,15,91,51,32],"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fidea",[58,33,31,93,59,32],"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fpricing",[62,33,31,93,63,32],[71,33,32,96,72,32],"commenter\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[],[99,104,108,113,117,121],{"id":100,"name":101,"points":102,"category":103},"32376154","Figure",417,"games",{"id":105,"name":106,"points":107,"category":20},"32348461","Penumbra",267,{"id":109,"name":110,"points":111,"category":112},"32409966","tevr-asr-tool",231,"ai",{"id":114,"name":115,"points":116,"category":20},"32344671","Superblocks",193,{"id":118,"name":119,"points":120,"category":20},"32352291","RocketRide",176,{"id":122,"name":123,"points":124,"category":20},"32353479","PDF-Diff",169,4,false,"v2",{"id":129,"name":5,"line":6,"ai":126,"cat":20,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rec":28,"s":29,"top":18,"kw":130,"maker":11,"domain":10,"tier":19,"attempts":32,"strip":131,"url":9,"mix":132,"praise":46,"objection":55,"sub":21},32339641,[24,25,26,27],"05110",[31,32,32,33],1794036623278]