[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":170},["ShallowReactive",2],{"project-47049848":3},{"id":4,"name":5,"line":6,"line_source":7,"title":8,"url":9,"domain":10,"maker":11,"posted_at":12,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rank_in_year":16,"shown_in_year":17,"top":18,"tier":19,"category":20,"subcategory":21,"format":22,"keywords":23,"reception":29,"sentiment":30,"stance_mix":31,"scored_comments":33,"aspects":34,"strip":35,"post_text":36,"what":37,"said":60,"maker_in_thread":107,"shape":115,"grid":118,"attempts":133,"same_week":134,"maker_shows":108,"maker_hidden":163,"reader_version":164,"card":165},"47049848","Continue","Source-controlled AI checks, enforceable in CI","title","Show HN: Continue – Source-controlled AI checks, enforceable in CI","https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.continue.dev","docs.continue.dev","sestinj",1771348094,2026,44,7,1324,4366,31,"shown","dev_tools","ai code review checks","cli",[24,25,26,27,28],"ai code review","pull request checks","ci checks","coding agents","github status checks","quiet",null,{"positive":32,"neutral":33,"mixed":32,"critical":32},0,3,{},[33,32,32,33,32,33,32],"We now write most of our code with agents. For a while, PRs piled up, causing review fatigue, and we had this sinking feeling that standards were slipping. Consistency is tough at this volume. I’m sharing the solution we found, which has become our main product.\n\nContinue (https:\u002F\u002Fdocs.continue.dev) runs AI checks on every PR. Each check is a source-controlled markdown file in `.continue\u002Fchecks\u002F` that shows up as a GitHub status check. They run as full agents, not just reading the diff, but able to read\u002Fwrite files, run bash commands, and use a browser. If it finds something, the check fails w",{"problem":38,"audience":44,"pricing":30,"motivation":52,"time_to_build":30,"stack":56,"openness":57,"stage":58,"team_size":59},{"value":39,"source":40,"evidence":41},"Review fatigue and slipping code standards as agent-written PRs pile up","maker",[42],{"id":43},"post",{"value":45,"source":46,"evidence":47},"Engineering teams reviewing many PRs, especially those using coding agents","inferred",[48,49],{"id":43},{"id":50,"by":11,"text":51},"47050858","I think this is a good summary! And the configurable part turns out to be the main bit One of the fundamental differences between checks and code review bots is that you trade…",{"value":53,"source":40,"evidence":54},"Their own PRs piled up and standards slipped, so they built checks for themselves",[55],{"id":43},[],"open_source","launched","unknown",{"praise":61,"objections":66,"requests":67,"questions":83,"alternatives":98},[62],{"value":63,"source":40,"evidence":64},"Configurable checks trade breadth for consistency, which the maker highlights as the key difference",[65],{"id":50,"by":11,"text":51},[],[68,79],{"value":69,"source":70,"evidence":71},"Export metrics in other formats such as CSV","commenter",[72,76],{"id":73,"by":74,"text":75},"47050777","esafak","This looks likes a more configurable version of the code review tools out there, for running arbitrary AI-powered tasks. Do you support exporting metrics to something standard…",{"id":77,"by":11,"text":78},"47050944","just saw the follow up questions: - we do! right now you can export some metrics as images, or share a link publicly to the broader dashboard. will be curious if others are…",{"value":80,"source":70,"evidence":81},"A brief demo",[82],{"id":73,"by":74,"text":75},[84,91],{"value":85,"source":70,"evidence":86},"Is this the same Continue as the local AI coding agent tool, and what changed?",[87],{"id":88,"by":89,"text":90},"47050451","bachittle","Is this the same continue that was for running local AI coding agents? Interesting rebrand.",{"value":92,"source":70,"evidence":93},"How does it differ from GitHub's gh-aw?",[94],{"id":95,"by":96,"text":97},"47053688","megamorf","How is it different from https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.github.io\u002Fgh-aw\u002F?",[99,103],{"value":100,"source":70,"evidence":101},"gh-aw (GitHub Agentic Workflows)",[102],{"id":95,"by":96,"text":97},{"value":104,"source":40,"evidence":105},"Code review bots",[106],{"id":50,"by":11,"text":51},{"comments":108,"answered":33,"key":109},4,[110,111,112],{"id":50,"text":51},{"id":77,"text":78},{"id":113,"text":114},"47054080","Actually very similar, GitHub was also early in talking about Continuous AI. I think the biggest difference is that Continue is very focused on the use case of checks and gets a…",{"commenters":108,"max_depth":33,"maker_replies":108,"first_comment_mins":116,"lifespan_hours":117},38,5,[119,121,124,126,127,129,131],[73,32,33,120,74,32],"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[50,32,32,122,11,123],"maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fidea",1,[77,32,32,125,11,123],"maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[95,123,33,120,96,32],[113,123,32,128,11,123],"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fidea",[88,130,33,120,89,32],2,[132,130,32,122,11,123],"47050676",[],[135,140,145,150,155,159],{"id":136,"name":137,"points":138,"category":139},"47031334","Jemini",488,"ai",{"id":141,"name":142,"points":143,"category":144},"47051852","AsteroidOS 2.0",470,"hardware",{"id":146,"name":147,"points":148,"category":149},"47026186","Microgpt",282,"learning_science",{"id":151,"name":152,"points":153,"category":154},"47040375","FreeFlow",277,"productivity",{"id":156,"name":157,"points":158,"category":149},"47008163","Data Engineering Book",251,{"id":160,"name":161,"points":162,"category":20},"47011567","SQL-tap",233,false,"v2",{"id":166,"name":5,"line":6,"ai":163,"cat":20,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rec":29,"s":30,"top":18,"kw":167,"maker":11,"domain":10,"tier":19,"attempts":32,"strip":168,"url":9,"mix":169,"praise":63,"objection":-1,"sub":21},47049848,[24,25,26,27,28],"3003030",[32,33,32,32],1793991144452]