[{"data":1,"prerenderedAt":227},["ShallowReactive",2],{"project-9963680":3},{"id":4,"name":5,"line":6,"line_source":7,"title":8,"url":9,"domain":10,"maker":11,"posted_at":12,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rank_in_year":16,"shown_in_year":17,"top":18,"tier":19,"category":20,"subcategory":21,"format":22,"keywords":23,"reception":28,"sentiment":29,"stance_mix":30,"scored_comments":35,"aspects":36,"strip":43,"post_text":45,"what":46,"said":70,"maker_in_thread":145,"shape":147,"grid":151,"attempts":191,"same_week":192,"maker_shows":31,"maker_hidden":220,"reader_version":221,"card":222},"9963680","Imgix Sandbox","Explore on-demand image processing","title","Show HN: Imgix Sandbox – Explore on-demand image processing","https:\u002F\u002Fsandbox.imgix.com","sandbox.imgix.com","zacman85",1438109220,2015,46,18,616,2565,25,"shown","infrastructure","image processing service","web_app",[24,25,26,27],"image processing","on-demand images","image cdn","image resizing","curious",0.08,{"positive":31,"neutral":32,"mixed":33,"critical":34},3,7,1,2,13,{"execution":37,"pricing":38,"idea":40,"docs":41,"performance":42},{"positive":34,"critical":33},{"positive":39,"critical":39},0,{"positive":39,"critical":39},{"positive":39,"critical":39},{"positive":33,"critical":33},[44,39,39,39,44,31,31,31,31,44,31,31,39,33,31,31,39,33],5,null,{"problem":47,"audience":45,"pricing":45,"motivation":59,"time_to_build":45,"stack":66,"openness":67,"stage":68,"team_size":69},{"value":48,"source":49,"evidence":50},"Processing and delivering images on demand without building an image pipeline","commenter",[51,55],{"id":52,"by":53,"text":54},"9965375","notduncansmith","I'd like to give a big shout-out to Imgix, they've built a truly useful service. Their landing page copy features lines like \"You can't build this in a weekend\" and \"This isn't…",{"id":56,"by":57,"text":58},"9965289","cscharenberg","Looks very similar to Cloudinary (http:\u002F\u002Fcloudinary.com) which I use for my startup. The pricing at lower end of images looks better for Imgix but doesn't scale as well. Still, I…",{"value":60,"source":49,"evidence":61},"Let people quickly iterate on ideas with the imgix API before using it",[62],{"id":63,"by":64,"text":65},"9965890","skuhn","The imgix sandbox is meant as a tool to experiment and try things out. Behind the scenes it uses imgix's production infrastructure via the published API. We think it's really…",[],"unknown","launched","company",{"praise":71,"objections":88,"requests":100,"questions":112,"alternatives":127},[72,81],{"value":73,"source":49,"evidence":74},"Saves infrastructure work and gives a strong image layer at a good price",[75,76,80],{"id":52,"by":53,"text":54},{"id":77,"by":78,"text":79},"9965501","mmastrac","I was skeptical about imgix, but I recently plugged it into a CMS for a startup I was helping out as a simple image editor + transcoding service. It did pretty much all the work:…",{"id":56,"by":57,"text":58},{"value":82,"source":49,"evidence":83},"Fast renders and smaller images via automatic content negotiation",[84],{"id":85,"by":86,"text":87},"9970179","kellysutton","(Employee of imgix here.) Most of our feature benefits are derived from being a \"full-stack\" imaging solution. Because we know a lot more about the request and the client, we're…",[89,93],{"value":90,"source":49,"evidence":91},"Pricing scales poorly at higher volumes compared with Cloudinary",[92],{"id":56,"by":57,"text":58},{"value":94,"source":49,"evidence":95},"Not a self-hostable option",[96],{"id":97,"by":98,"text":99},"9965869","choonkeat","having an image server with apis solves 80% of the problem. having a client counterpart lib to ease you in solves the other 80% https:\u002F\u002Fgithub.com\u002Fchoonkeat\u002Fattache_rails being…",[101],{"value":102,"source":49,"evidence":103},"Benchmarks against ImageMagick and libvips",[104,108],{"id":105,"by":106,"text":107},"9968890","n0thing","Assuming you're not using ImageMagick, what are you using and what makes your solution superior? Do you have any benchmarks comparing against ImageMagick\u002FGraphicsMagick?",{"id":109,"by":110,"text":111},"9973349","mc74","Rather than ImageMagick, how do your benchmarks compare against libvips? http:\u002F\u002Fsharp.dimens.io\u002Fen\u002Fstable\u002F",[113,120],{"value":114,"source":49,"evidence":115},"Is it ImageMagick as a service?",[116],{"id":117,"by":118,"text":119},"9965343","monksy","So this is imagmagik as a service?",{"value":121,"source":49,"evidence":122},"How hard is it to migrate from Cloudinary?",[123],{"id":124,"by":125,"text":126},"9965843","tortilla","I'm on Cloudinary and looking to migrate out. How difficult was it to switch? I'm at the Enterprise level at Cloudinary",[128,133,141],{"value":129,"source":49,"evidence":130},"Cloudinary",[131,132],{"id":56,"by":57,"text":58},{"id":52,"by":53,"text":54},{"value":134,"source":49,"evidence":135},"ImageMagick",[136,137],{"id":117,"by":118,"text":119},{"id":138,"by":139,"text":140},"9965561","kogir","If ImageMagick meets your needs, use it. However, after doing so, you may find that it's terrible code, slow, leaky, and a giant pain to use in production at any real scale.",{"value":142,"source":49,"evidence":143},"libvips (sharp)",[144],{"id":109,"by":110,"text":111},{"comments":39,"answered":39,"key":146},[],{"commenters":35,"max_depth":148,"maker_replies":39,"first_comment_mins":149,"lifespan_hours":150},6,291,148,[152,154,156,158,160,161,163,165,167,169,171,172,175,178,183,184,187,189],[52,39,44,153,53,39],"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fexecution",[124,39,39,155,125,39],"commenter\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[157,39,39,155,53,39],"9966032",[159,39,39,155,125,39],"9969478",[77,33,44,153,78,39],[56,34,31,162,57,39],"project\u002Fmixed\u002Fpricing",[97,31,31,164,98,39],"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fidea",[63,31,31,166,64,39],"maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fdocs",[105,31,31,168,106,39],"project\u002Fneutral\u002Fperformance",[85,31,44,170,86,39],"project\u002Fpositive\u002Fperformance",[109,31,31,168,110,39],[173,31,31,174,86,39],"10000522","maker\u002Fneutral\u002Fperformance",[176,31,39,177,86,39],"9970664","other\u002Fneutral\u002Fnone",[179,180,33,181,182,39],"9965792",4,"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fexecution","biturd",[117,44,31,164,118,39],[185,44,31,164,186,39],"9965419","chrislloyd",[188,44,39,155,118,39],"9965844",[138,44,33,190,139,39],"project\u002Fcritical\u002Fperformance",[],[193,198,203,208,212,216],{"id":194,"name":195,"points":196,"category":197},"9962185","Spot the Drowning Child",1215,"learning_science",{"id":199,"name":200,"points":201,"category":202},"9944746","Showgoers",281,"consumer_social",{"id":204,"name":205,"points":206,"category":207},"9956415","Meshtag",270,"dev_tools",{"id":209,"name":210,"points":211,"category":197},"9963714","Flexbox.io",236,{"id":213,"name":214,"points":215,"category":20},"9969171","File.io",155,{"id":217,"name":218,"points":219,"category":197},"9969345","parametricity.com",149,false,"v2",{"id":223,"name":5,"line":6,"ai":220,"cat":20,"year":13,"points":14,"comments":15,"rec":28,"s":29,"top":18,"kw":224,"maker":11,"domain":10,"tier":19,"attempts":39,"strip":225,"url":9,"mix":226,"praise":73,"objection":90,"sub":21},9963680,[24,25,26,27],"500053333533013301",[31,32,33,34],1794036533848]