Pipecat
Dev tools
command line utility
SHOW HN2016
48points
14comments
#762of 2,264 in 2016
Top 34%of 2016 by points
How HN took it
MixedNo clear lean
4 positive, 3 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 2 critical, out of 10 comments about the project. Thread score +0.15.
Design: 1 for, 1 againstIdea: 0 for, 1 against
The thread, comment by comment
Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.
positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker
What HN said
What people liked
Looks cool and useful
From 3 comments
This looks really cool. I went ahead and added it to the Arch User Repositories[0]. [0]: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/pipecat-bin/
kenny_r on HNGreat job! I am definitely gonna use this daily!
nikolay on HNVery cool!
jbverschoor on HN
Objections
Name overloads the existing 'message queue' term from System V IPC
From 1 comment
Ok, I know message queues[1] are not the most popular part of System V IPC, but was it really necessary to overload the name? (I mean ActiveMQ et al overloading "message queue"…
pdkl95 on HN
Logo was seen as unappealing or offensive
From 1 comment
That logo... yikes.
sjs382 on HN
Requests
Support for ZeroMQ
From 1 comment
Why no 0mq? :)
nyan4 on HN
Usage scenario examples
From 1 comment
hey guys can u provide usage scenario ?
agborkowski86 on HN
Questions
Why no ZeroMQ support?
From 1 comment
Why no 0mq? :)
nyan4 on HN