FaaS
Infrastructure
serverless functions
SHOW HN2017
How HN took it
3 positive, 5 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 4 critical, out of 12 comments about the project. Thread score -0.04.
Idea: 2 for, 1 againstDesign: 1 for, 1 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 against
The thread, comment by comment
Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.
positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker
What HN said
What people liked
Simple to install and deploy with one command
From 1 comment
The Docker FaaS UI and built-in Prometheus metrics is a great way to build a Serverless configuration. Not to mention how easy it is to install and deploy with one command.
vegasbrianc on HN
Built-in UI and Prometheus metrics
From 1 comment
The Docker FaaS UI and built-in Prometheus metrics is a great way to build a Serverless configuration. Not to mention how easy it is to install and deploy with one command.
vegasbrianc on HN
Objections
Process startup per invocation adds latency
From 2 comments
I like the simplicity, but have some issues with the stdin/stdout approach - firing up a new interpreter for every invocation has the potential to become costly in terms of time…
rcarmo on HNWhat's interesting is that all other alternatives listed here in comments also use stdin & stdout. Have we returned to CGI?
hdhzy on HN
Overhead of functions compared with microservices
From 1 comment
The project and UI looks very cool. But can someone explain to me why FaaS is a good thing? Isn't this just a perversion of microservices with a ton of development, operations,…
arekkas on HN
Requests
Map query parameters and headers to input
From 2 comments
Wow, I was thinking about building something like that but this looks very good! Is there a way to map query parameters and / or http headers to input JSON? (a la API Gateway).
hdhzy on HNSometimes I've got a service that won't send plain JSON but rather some data in query parameters and some in http headers. So it's rather for integration with others. AWS API…
hdhzy on HN
Example of a function accepting POST
From 1 comment
It would be nice to see an example of a function that accepts POST, btw., since that would make it easy to do a long-running function that took advantage of recurring requests to…
rcarmo on HN
Questions
How does it compare to iron functions
From 1 comment
Anyone knows how this compare to iron functions https://github.com/iron-io/functions Looks similar. Docker image with entry point but the entry point is a server instead of…
hbt on HN
Alternatives named
iron functions
From 1 comment
Anyone knows how this compare to iron functions https://github.com/iron-io/functions Looks similar. Docker image with entry point but the entry point is a server instead of…
hbt on HN
hook.io microcule
From 1 comment
Anyone knows how this compare to iron functions https://github.com/iron-io/functions Looks similar. Docker image with entry point but the entry point is a server instead of…
hbt on HN
Fission
From 1 comment
There's also http://fission.io
mankash666 on HN
AWS Lambda
From 1 comment
Kindof. If you look at aws lambda, you get a few more things for the overhead price: namely, integration with other services (Iam, cognito) and no need to worry about whether…
zdragnar on HN