Infreqdb

Data

key value database

SHOW HN2017

39points
28comments
#912of 2,242 in 2017
Top 41%of 2017 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

1 positive, 4 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 2 critical, out of 7 comments about the project. Thread score +0.02.

Idea: 1 for, 1 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful idea; batching writes enables high-volume timeseries storage

    From 1 comment
    • Stuff like this is great! And you said you mentioned you are primarily doing it for timeseries data - then you can easily batch writes to handle high volume throughput too! We…
      marknadal on HN

Objections

  • Costs dominated by PUT requests; retries can rack up charges

    From 2 comments
    • Be careful using S3 for lots of small writes. The price is utterly dominated by the PUT calls which cost $0.01/1000.
      spullara on HN
    • Be most careful with retries. Saw a case where the bucket wasn't writable and the code just retried in a loop. You get charged for the API call, successful or not.
      spullara on HN

Requests

  • Clarify pricing in README calculations

    From 1 comment
    • Yes. I should include this info in the README calcs. For my usecase I intend to do 4 - 10 PUTs per hour, since they are batched. 10 PUTS/h = 7300 PUTs/month = $0.073/month. The…
      sajal83 on HN

Questions

  • How does it differ from AWS Athena?

    From 1 comment
    • How is this different than AWS Athena ? - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-athena-interactive-sql-queries-for-data-in-amazon-s3/ Also why don't you dump the log data into…
      udkl on HN
  • Why not DynamoDB instead of S3?

    From 2 comments
    • How is this different than AWS Athena ? - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-athena-interactive-sql-queries-for-data-in-amazon-s3/ Also why don't you dump the log data into…
      udkl on HN
    • Maybe you should take another look at pricing? DynamoDB is like $0.002/GB/month more expensive than S3 for storage. Requests are more expensive, but you're also not reinventing…
      eropple on HN

Alternatives named

  • AWS Athena

    From 1 comment
    • How is this different than AWS Athena ? - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-athena-interactive-sql-queries-for-data-in-amazon-s3/ Also why don't you dump the log data into…
      udkl on HN
  • DynamoDB

    From 1 comment
    • How is this different than AWS Athena ? - https://aws.amazon.com/blogs/aws/amazon-athena-interactive-sql-queries-for-data-in-amazon-s3/ Also why don't you dump the log data into…
      udkl on HN
  • MinIO

    From 1 comment
    • If your data storage requirement is semi-constant at 1.5TB and is ephemeral, have you looked at just using your own replicated servers ? That would probably turn out to be…
      udkl on HN
  • TrailDB

    From 1 comment
    • We use a similar approach with TrailDB. You can make S3 access totally seamless with user-space page fault handling, which is pretty cool:…
      vtuulos on HN
  • Datomic

    From 1 comment
    • So, a database that's has a file format of write-once content-addressed "shards" and is persisted/distributed by "offlining" those shards into object storage, and then "onlining"…
      derefr on HN
  • CouchDB

    From 1 comment
    • > The world needs an open-source, non-JVM-targeted Datomic.) Couchdb?
      reubano on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/14212211)