Sitebulb

Dev tools

seo crawler

SHOW HN2017

120points
72comments
#354of 2,242 in 2017
Top 16%of 2017 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

9 positive, 13 neutral or asking, 3 mixed, 11 critical, out of 36 comments about the project. Thread score -0.01.

Pricing: 1 for, 4 againstPerformance: 0 for, 4 againstDesign: 0 for, 2 againstIdea: 2 for, 0 againstExecution: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful reporting and visualisation, a strong product for SEO audits.

    From 4 comments
    • Ditto on the sitebulb love. It's a well-done product and a welcome challenger to the status-quo of SEO software out there. I will say the cost gives me hesitation but you've put…
      EvanKRob on HN
    • Have been using during the beta programme - really useful tool for doing site audits and focusing quickly on the areas that can make the most difference. Already using on client…
      seosimon on HN
    • I've been testing Sitebulb for a few months now and I'm really impressed, you've done solid work guys :) good luck with the launch
      thehodge on HN
    • Nice to use and useful insights. Thanks!
      sbeckeriv on HN
  • Local storage means crawls run on the user's machine with no data sent to a server.

    From 1 comment
    • Yep exactly. All crawls are stored locally so there is no data issue to worry about.
      hathawayp on HN

Objections

  • Monthly-only billing with no annual plan.

    From 1 comment
    • This looks really good. My only comment I have is that if I am purchasing a piece of desktop software I expect there to be at least the option of an annual license. Monthly feels…
      throwaway2016a on HN
  • Expensive compared with Screaming Frog.

    From 2 comments
    • Agreed. This seems like SF + Gephi for 7x the price.
      seano314 on HN
    • Ditto on the sitebulb love. It's a well-done product and a welcome challenger to the status-quo of SEO software out there. I will say the cost gives me hesitation but you've put…
      EvanKRob on HN
  • Email confirmation required before use.

    From 1 comment
    • Some feedback: - Why require the email confirmation before using the software? Not really necessary, is it? - No Umlauts in project name? - Standard/advanced settings switcher is…
      Sujan on HN
  • Large download size and high resource use on desktop.

    From 2 comments
    • why is the windows download 130mb? that seems excessve
      grandpoobah on HN
    • The problem is for big crawls( and 500k is not large) you probably don't want to use your desktop for example my home adsl is only 3.5 as we are 6kyards from the exchange. And I…
      walshemj on HN

Requests

  • Linux version.

    From 3 comments
  • Annual license option.

    From 1 comment
    • This looks really good. My only comment I have is that if I am purchasing a piece of desktop software I expect there to be at least the option of an annual license. Monthly feels…
      throwaway2016a on HN
  • Mac App Store availability.

    From 1 comment
    • This looks really good. My only comment I have is that if I am purchasing a piece of desktop software I expect there to be at least the option of an annual license. Monthly feels…
      throwaway2016a on HN

Questions

  • How it differs from Screaming Frog.

    From 3 comments
    • What's this doing differently or better than screamingfrog? Which is also a desktop program and provides quite robust information. SF has been one of the standard industry tools…
      SnowingXIV on HN
    • How does this compete against screaming frog?
      hayksaakian on HN
    • The main difference from Screaming Frog (which is legitimately awesome) is the reporting. Once it has finished crawling it will do a lot of pre-processing for you and build…
      hathawayp on HN
  • How it compares to Scrutiny.

    From 2 comments
    • How does this compare to something like Scrutiny, which seems to do a similar thing?
      danielsamuels on HN
    • It has a lot more comprehensive reporting and data visualization than the likes of Scrutiny. I have no idea of the scale limitations of Scrutiny, but I'd be very surprised if it…
      hathawayp on HN
  • Why it is a desktop app rather than cloud.

    From 2 comments
    • Interesting that it’s all a desktop app. What problem do you think this solves compared to something that runs in the cloud ? Apart from the cost structure, I can’t think of…
      stingraycharles on HN
    • The other big thing, in comparison to cloud software, is convenience. You can setup a crawl and start it running -and see URLs being crawled - within a minute. On cloud software…
      hathawayp on HN

Alternatives named

  • Screaming Frog

    From 2 comments
    • What's this doing differently or better than screamingfrog? Which is also a desktop program and provides quite robust information. SF has been one of the standard industry tools…
      SnowingXIV on HN
    • How does this compete against screaming frog?
      hayksaakian on HN
  • Deepcrawl

    From 1 comment
    • Deepcrawl does that, but again it entirely depends on the website type and infastructure you have got.
      gerenuk on HN
  • Scrutiny

    From 1 comment
    • How does this compare to something like Scrutiny, which seems to do a similar thing?
      danielsamuels on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/15356599)