upvote.pub

Learning and science

academic discussion platform

SHOW HN2018

Legend

upvote.pub

A HN/Reddit-style site for scientific pre-prints and publications

upvote.pub

#preprints#academic discussion#arxiv#biorxiv#scientific publications

275points
107comments
#101of 2,155 in 2018
Top 5%of 2018 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

8 positive, 40 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 24 critical, out of 74 comments about the project. Thread score -0.17.

Idea: 7 for, 11 againstDesign: 1 for, 11 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Good idea and slick site

    From 2 comments
    • Really, really, really cool. Site looks slick. I would definitely use this if there were more users (the old chicken and egg problem ...). My suggestion is not to restrict it…
      Rainymood on HN
    • This is awesome! One suggestion I should make: I think it would be nice to have the abstract underneath the title of the paper so I can skim to see what the doc is about before…
      sinab on HN
  • Annotation and discussion of papers would be valuable

    From 2 comments
    • Great job! I had thought of building something like this before. Some ideas I'd toyed with were: - A tool for annotation so that people could comment on specific portions of…
      kiliantics on HN
    • The first thing you mentioned, annotations, or maybe even inline Q&A/discussions, was my dream in grad school (math). I imagined something like a separate MathOverflow for each…
      throwaway080383 on HN

Objections

  • Restricting to academic email addresses excludes independent researchers

    From 2 comments
    • I completely understand the issue of not wanting spam of various sorts broadly defined, but I do think restricting it to academic addresses is a huge mistake. As an established…
      o2348diuu on HN
    • > I do think restricting it to academic addresses is a huge mistake I have to agree. I'm no academic for almost 10 years, now, yet I've spent the last three years working with…
      Arkanosis on HN
  • Thumbnails are not useful and the layout is too sparse

    From 3 comments
    • Really like the site! Not an academic but i was wondering why the thumbnail? They all look pretty much the same, why would I want to see a thumbnail of lot of text?
      Kamshak on HN
    • Cool, but personally when I hear something as being HN/reddit style, I think of of the listings being pretty compact (submittable, votable listings are done on many other…
      torgoguys on HN
    • For non-mobile, increase the size of all of the text. You have a lot of room to work with, there's no reason for text to be so tiny. That includes the upvote arrow & text, and…
      adventured on HN
  • Upvote/karma model is poor for research discussion

    From 1 comment
    • I’m a researcher and I also think reddit and upvotes/karma is trash. Why should I use your service?
      taylorexpander on HN

Requests

  • Allow non-academic emails such as .gov and .mil or alternate verification

    From 4 comments
    • Can you please allow .mil and .gov addresses? Those "government scientists" add up to a lot of researchers.
      killjoywashere on HN
    • Perhaps they can add support for alternate emails - sign up with your primary academic email, add a secondary. When a user leaves an institution, they can promote the secondary.
      politician on HN
    • > Let me know if you have any thoughts/ideas Many papers list authors' email addresses. Scrape PDFs on the services you support for email addresses. If a domain name occurs in…
      throwawayjava on HN
    • How about doing a scraping of e.g. 10k Google Scholar profiles with more than ~10 publications to get the domains of their verified email addresses? Then you have a much broader…
      semi-extrinsic on HN
  • Add more subject areas beyond biology

    From 3 comments
    • It seems really skewed towards biology publications, is it on purpose ?
      fuklief on HN
    • Some idea for other subs: Computer Science/Maths/Physics should be the most common I think Also https://eprint.iacr.org/ is used a lot for publishing crypto preprints
      fuklief on HN
    • If there are any subs you would like to have added please let me know. Currently, I know the site is restricted to biology and a small stats section but I can easily add…
      danielecook on HN
  • Add PsyArXiv and other preprint servers

    From 2 comments
    • Do you plan to add PsyArXiv? (https://psyarxiv.com/)
      khr on HN
    • Some idea for other subs: Computer Science/Maths/Physics should be the most common I think Also https://eprint.iacr.org/ is used a lot for publishing crypto preprints
      fuklief on HN
  • Show abstracts under titles

    From 1 comment
    • This is awesome! One suggestion I should make: I think it would be nice to have the abstract underneath the title of the paper so I can skim to see what the doc is about before…
      sinab on HN

Questions

  • What is the target audience, researchers or the general public?

    From 2 comments
    • So one question: who is your target audience? Is it the layman/citizen researcher who might want to read academic publications? Or is it more meant to apply peer review to…
      Vinnl on HN
    • I have thought about a site like this before (as I'm sure many have)! One thing I thought about is how do you keep noise out of the comments while maintaining engagement with the…
      pwillia7 on HN
  • How is the academic email filter implemented?

    From 2 comments
    • How did you implement the academic email filter? Where did you get the domain list? I just have registered my account with a none .edu email address.
      doomjunky on HN
    • Ops, I meant to ask how they were validating academic addresses. I'm actually a postdoc, but my university domain is @upv.es, and I've found that sometimes it doesn't get…
      JorgeGT on HN

Alternatives named

  • SciRate

    From 1 comment
    • See also SciRate, which is mildly popular in the quantum info community. http://www.scirate.com
      jessriedel on HN
  • arxiver

    From 1 comment
    • You might want to investigate having a mode where you can see some of the figures from each paper. This works very well for astronomical arxiv papers: http://arxiver.moonhats.com/
      xioxox on HN
  • ORCID login as a verification method

    From 1 comment
    • Seconded. I'm not an academic but I deal with academic publishing and I might want to participate. My suggestion: use ORCiD.org for authentication with OAuth. This is a…
      afandian on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/16273171)