hole_fixer

Creative

3d mesh processing

SHOW HN2018

104points
18comments
#417of 2,155 in 2018
Top 20%of 2018 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

3 positive, 2 neutral or asking, 3 mixed, 2 critical, out of 10 comments about the project. Thread score 0.00.

Idea: 2 for, 2 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful references to prior art and good context.

    From 2 comments
    • Maybe it was not polite of him to dismiss the blog post (and maybe that wasn't his intention), but I do appreciate that he provided references to prior art, and also took the…
      nicklaf on HN
    • I also appreciate the provided references.
      erkaman on HN
  • Good expository writing on variational calculus.

    From 1 comment
    • Yea I really liked your post because of that focus. I use variation all calculus quite a lot for non-programming stuff and it’s really allowed me to understand things like NNs…
      pducks32 on HN

Objections

  • Not novel; smooth hole filling with polynomials and curves has existed for decades.

    From 1 comment
    • This is sort of neat but not really useful and not novel. The reason it isn't novel is that people have been smoothly filling holes via various polynomials and other smooth…
      bhouston on HN
  • Real scanner data needs volumetric best-fit, not a surface-only fix.

    From 1 comment
    • This is sort of neat but not really useful and not novel. The reason it isn't novel is that people have been smoothly filling holes via various polynomials and other smooth…
      bhouston on HN
  • Globally changes the whole mesh, which can lose detail.

    From 1 comment
    • For visualization or maybe 3D printing, yea. But for finite element analysis, you don't want smooth filling at weird corners/etc. A flat surface is more efficient since it can…
      lopmotr on HN

Questions

  • Can the refinement and unrefinement steps be avoided?

    From 1 comment
    • For visualization or maybe 3D printing, yea. But for finite element analysis, you don't want smooth filling at weird corners/etc. A flat surface is more efficient since it can…
      lopmotr on HN

Alternatives named

  • MeshFix implements similar hole filling.

    From 1 comment
    • Nice explanation. I think meshfix implements this too: https://github.com/MarcoAttene/MeshFix-V2.1
      FrankDixon on HN
  • Radial basis function implicit surfaces.

    From 1 comment
    • I did almost the same thing in a very different way as part of my PhD research: https://imgur.com/a/k6AQi I did it by representing the surface implicitly with radial basis…
      mkl on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/16468894)