GraphCMS

Web and SaaS

headless cms

SHOW HN2018

115points
69comments
#378of 2,155 in 2018
Top 18%of 2018 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

5 positive, 14 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 14 critical, out of 33 comments about the project. Thread score -0.22.

Pricing: 0 for, 6 againstIdea: 1 for, 2 againstDocs: 0 for, 2 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Looking forward to the new version and its features

    From 2 comments
    • Can't wait to use the new version! I've been looking forward to a lot of the new features.
      carterkwon on HN
    • +1, very much looking forward to that Show HN.
      neeksHN on HN
  • Headless CMS approach gives frontend freedom

    From 1 comment
    • Nothing is wrong with plain old HTML. Going headless gives you frontend freedom. It means integrating your content on any platform you like: web, mobile, smartwatch, fridges and…
      mlukaszczyk on HN

Objections

  • No self-hosting option; SaaS lock-in and hosting dependency risk

    From 3 comments
    • >> Can I host GraphCMS on my own servers? >> Please talk to sales to discuss deployment options. This is not an answer. Talk to sales? I don't mind paying for support. I'm not a…
      ericfrederich on HN
    • The scary thing to me is if a service like this stops, I have an angry client and a lot of work. Headless CMS's are a delight to work with though.
      les on HN
    • Yes, I'd be interested if I could self-host. As others mentioned, having this externally hosted introduces another potential point of failure.
      everdev on HN
  • Unclear what the product does from the landing page

    From 1 comment
  • Focus on GraphQL rather than the product itself

    From 1 comment
    • Graphql is not a product pitch. I don't care. Even your product page just shows an editor that looks like a WordPress article. Why do I need graphql to pull an article from a…
      weego on HN

Requests

  • Allow self-hosting or open source the CMS

    From 3 comments
    • It'd be rather refreshing if one of the headless CMS PaaS solutions could follow an open model similar to WordPress/Gitlab
      neeksHN on HN
    • >> Can I host GraphCMS on my own servers? >> Please talk to sales to discuss deployment options. This is not an answer. Talk to sales? I don't mind paying for support. I'm not a…
      ericfrederich on HN
    • +1 Very interested in self hosting. Especially to meet data residency and locality requirements for a few projects that I have.
      j45 on HN
  • Open source the content management interface

    From 1 comment
    • Hey! I'm one of the co-founders of GraphCMS. We will soon start open sourcing our content management interface, so users have the opportunity to customize the CMS UI to their…
      mlukaszczyk on HN
  • Compare with Contentful

    From 1 comment
    • Can you compare pros/cons to Contentful?
      tcc8 on HN

Questions

  • Can it be self-hosted?

    From 1 comment
    • >> Can I host GraphCMS on my own servers? >> Please talk to sales to discuss deployment options. This is not an answer. Talk to sales? I don't mind paying for support. I'm not a…
      ericfrederich on HN
  • Does it support subscriptions or live updates?

    From 1 comment
    • How are you currently handling subscriptions or live updates/polling?
      sbr464 on HN
  • Can schema be defined via API and synced?

    From 1 comment
    • Looks great, excited to try it out. Just skimming through the Documentation, is there any way to specify the Schema through an API? My use case that I want to define my schema…
      shazzy on HN

Alternatives named

  • Contentful

    From 2 comments
    • Exactly. Or drastically changes their pricing model (see: Contentful). I understand the benefits of all of these individual services, but I also miss the days of the only service…
      jonheller on HN
    • Can you compare pros/cons to Contentful?
      tcc8 on HN
  • Directus

    From 1 comment
  • Squidex

    From 1 comment
    • Squidex is MIT license and has reasonable pricing for their cloud offering, also has graphQL support and more feature rich.
      arpinum on HN
  • Strapi

    From 1 comment
    • There are lots out there, but the terminology is not consistent so it's hard to identify them. Perhaps one of these would serve your needs: https://strapi.io https://getcockpit.com
      jordanlev on HN
  • Craft CMS

    From 1 comment
    • Craft CMS is designed for deployment on your own servers. It does not offer a hosted version as yet, but has just as strong a headless mode with full graphql support with craftql.
      578493025678493 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/17450974)