Gamification.org

Learning and science

open wiki reference on gamification

SHOW HN2010

76points
25comments
#19of 370 in 2010
Top 6%of 2010 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

2 positive, 3 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 7 critical, out of 14 comments about the project. Thread score -0.30.

Idea: 2 for, 4 againstDesign: 0 for, 2 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful resource with interesting ideas on motivation

    From 3 comments
    • I think this is a great resource. If integrated correctly (game layer) then I believe websites with decent traffic + communities built around them will be able retain users…
      gamediesel on HN
    • To be fair, it looks like this page suggests a lot more than just adding points to things. I am reading it as a primer on human psychology. The real question in my mind is this:…
      Xurinos on HN
    • This sounds wonderful. However the "What is Gamification?" is a much better first page than the home page is, with respect to explaining things.
      simonsarris on HN

Objections

  • Gamification term is buzzword; misunderstands games

    From 3 comments
    • I'm a game designer. I can tell you that seeing the "gamification" movement makes my stomach churn. These are just a bunch of f*ing reward schemes. Web developers don't have a…
      fatso784 on HN
    • Fellow game developer here. I can't wait for "gamification" to die. It represents a fundamental misunderstanding of what games are and can be. To make it more annoying, in…
      bendotc on HN
    • I agree. I think the adoption of the term "gamification" has caused a rift because really, this isn't about making things in to games or creating fun - it's about creating…
      ryanelkins on HN
  • Site layout unclear and ad-like; wiki looks dated

    From 3 comments
    • The site covers an interesting idea; but I found it intensely off putting because a lot of the language sounds like "ad-speak". It's also not clear to the un-initiated what on…
      ErrantX on HN
    • I think you should move away from Wikimedia as a CMS platform. It's crusty, looks terrible, and is a trademarked for "half-assed projects" as far as I'm concerned. To be brutally…
      krainboltgreene on HN
    • A mix of humor and thoughts on the site layout: I harbored a tiny hope that this website would give me a progress bar for reading through it and that I could earn achievements…
      Xurinos on HN
  • Calling it open source is misleading

    From 2 comments
    • Just a small note: Game mechanics can't be protected per [FL-108](http://www.copyright.gov/fls/fl108.html) > Copyright does not protect the idea for a game, its name or title, or…
      krainboltgreene on HN
    • I feel the term Open Source in this context refers to open sharing of closed (proprietary rather than copyrighted) information, not specific copyright/patent-free work. Game…
      jlees on HN

Requests

  • Consolidate with existing game mechanic catalogues

    From 1 comment
    • Though I like this idea, there are now several projects dedicated to cataloguing game mechanics. Is it possible to have some sort of consolidation of effort? Two others: * I…
      _delirium on HN
  • Replace MediaWiki with a lighter CMS

    From 1 comment
    • I think you should move away from Wikimedia as a CMS platform. It's crusty, looks terrible, and is a trademarked for "half-assed projects" as far as I'm concerned. To be brutally…
      krainboltgreene on HN
  • Add gamification to the site itself, such as progress or badges

    From 1 comment
    • A mix of humor and thoughts on the site layout: I harbored a tiny hope that this website would give me a progress bar for reading through it and that I could earn achievements…
      Xurinos on HN

Questions

  • Is there a code library of game mechanics?

    From 1 comment
    • From the title I thought this would link to code: some sort of OSS library/abstraction-layer for providing common game mechanics. Is there anything like that yet, in any language?
      limist on HN
  • Can game mechanics be patented?

    From 3 comments
    • While you can patent a game, or game materials, you can't patent a game mechanic.
      krainboltgreene on HN
    • You certainly can't copyright a game mechanic. But, as long as software, algorithms and business processes are patentable so are game mechanics. Also, patents aren't so much…
      njharman on HN
    • You have that backwards. You can't patent a game or game materials (these can be copyrighted or trademarked or both), but you could patent game mechanics b/c they were…
      rprasad on HN

Alternatives named

  • SCVNGR Secret Game Mechanics Playdeck

    From 1 comment
    • Our wiki is still primitive, but open for feedback and contributions. Akin to the SCVNGR's Secret Game Mechanics Playdeck, we include a repository of classic game mechanics at…
      jrbedard on HN
  • Game Ontology Project

    From 1 comment
    • Though I like this idea, there are now several projects dedicated to cataloguing game mechanics. Is it possible to have some sort of consolidation of effort? Two others: * I…
      _delirium on HN
  • TV Tropes videogame section

    From 1 comment
    • Though I like this idea, there are now several projects dedicated to cataloguing game mechanics. Is it possible to have some sort of consolidation of effort? Two others: * I…
      _delirium on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/1958728)