SecAlerts

Security and privacy

vulnerability alerts

SHOW HN2019

SecAlerts

Enter your URL and view CVEs affecting your stack over last 6 months

secalerts.co

#cve alerts#vulnerability scanner#web stack detection#security audit

144points
48comments
#304of 2,195 in 2019
Top 14%of 2019 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

1 positive, 7 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 13 critical, out of 22 comments about the project. Thread score -0.50.

Execution: 1 for, 6 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 3 againstPerformance: 0 for, 2 againstIdea: 0 for, 2 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Detected stack and a critical CVE for coop.co.uk

    From 1 comment
    • The first URL I entered (coop.co.uk) was actually pretty awesome, it detected Varnish and showed a critical CVE from last week. That’s cool. I hope that if you subscribe, the…
      paulfurley on HN

Objections

  • Publishing a site's stack makes it easier to attack

    From 4 comments
    • i don't need to provide my (potentially vulnerable) production URL to whoever-you-might-be in order to identify the last 6 months of vulnerabilities - I can just google for that.…
      meesterdude on HN
    • This is the textbook definition of security by obscurity.
      adtac on HN
    • Part of securing your stack is not sharing with everyone exactly what you have, or do you not study security at all?
      not_a_cop75 on HN
    • This is a nice addendum to the "Let Us Identify Your Stack" style web services tho I guess some of them might already provide this. It does have the somewhat negative effect of…
      mellosouls on HN
  • Privacy concern about collecting IPs and stack data

    From 2 comments
    • Finally, a place that can gather IP addresses and associate them to specific security products to have them hacked later. Just what I've been waiting for.
      not_a_cop75 on HN
    • It's not you, but the implicit idea of trust. How are three people I know nothing about going to give me better results than a known name? Best of luck establishing yourselves…
      not_a_cop75 on HN
  • Detection is inaccurate (Apache, Ruby on Rails misidentified)

    From 2 comments
  • Fails to detect many servers such as lighttpd

    From 2 comments
    • I pointed it at my lighttpd server and all I got was "cannot detect software" or so.
      swiley on HN
    • Wasn’t able to detect what software my site use, my server name was disabled.
      jamessteel on HN
  • API overloaded and returning errors

    From 1 comment
    • Looks like it's overloaded - HTTP/502 on the API here.
      r1ch on HN

Requests

  • Detect by library or framework, not platform

    From 1 comment
    • It’s a pretty poor implementation that is basically matching on the lowest common denominator, by platform rather than by library or framework. An ASP.NET website is fully…
      ComputerGuru on HN
  • Crawl subdirectories to find multiple technologies

    From 1 comment
    • It’s a pretty poor implementation that is basically matching on the lowest common denominator, by platform rather than by library or framework. An ASP.NET website is fully…
      ComputerGuru on HN
  • Periodic rescanning and alerts

    From 2 comments
    • The first URL I entered (coop.co.uk) was actually pretty awesome, it detected Varnish and showed a critical CVE from last week. That’s cool. I hope that if you subscribe, the…
      paulfurley on HN
    • Is there an open source alternative that could be self-hosted and configured to run automated and periodical checks?
      mrlucax on HN
  • Open source release

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • Is it open source?

    From 1 comment
  • Is there a self-hosted open source alternative?

    From 1 comment
    • Is there an open source alternative that could be self-hosted and configured to run automated and periodical checks?
      mrlucax on HN

Alternatives named

  • Wappalyzer and browser extensions

    From 2 comments
    • There are browser extensions that do this same thing. It's pretty trivial to do.
      dahfizz on HN
    • https://www.whatruns.com/ not so precise must say
      oriettaxx on HN
  • Shodan

    From 1 comment
  • OWASP ZAP, Nikto, Metasploit

    From 3 comments
    • While not a web or automated option - if you want to run a quick crawl and scan on your apps you could try OWASP ZAP, it also has quite a few handy plugins -…
      smcleod on HN
    • Metasploit isn't the best choice for webapps, you probably want nikto or similar. Here's the owasp list: https://www.owasp.org/index.php/Category:Vulnerability_Scanning_Tools
      Godel_unicode on HN
    • Metasploit? You don't even need to host it (why are we so obsessed with making everything a website?)
      dahfizz on HN
  • masscan

    From 1 comment
    • In fact, there's a tool that claims to scan the internet in 6 minutes: https://github.com/robertdavidgraham/masscan
      nighthawk454 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/20921962)