Scholarref tools

Productivity

reference management

SHOW HN2019

127points
18comments
#360of 2,195 in 2019
Top 17%of 2019 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

4 positive, 1 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 3 critical, out of 9 comments about the project. Thread score +0.13.

Execution: 2 for, 1 againstIdea: 2 for, 1 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Simple POSIX-style shell scripts with few dependencies

    From 1 comment
    • > clicking the "Download PDF" link should redirect the user to an unusable in-browser PDF viewer Pro tip: in Elsevier's case, middle-click the "Download PDF" link so it opens in…
      JorgeGT on HN
  • Useful for mobile paper workflows

    From 1 comment
    • I really love the idea of ditching reference managers. The utility of these three scripts (or something like them) really is demonstrated when on mobile. RSS feeds, Twitter (or…
      hirenj on HN

Objections

  • Headline misleading; only useful if papers are on Sci-Hub

    From 1 comment
    • I’m pleased to see this as I have been working on some shell scripts for managing a collection of research PDFs myself. But I think the headline’s a little misleading. The…
      sjy on HN
  • Relies on DOIs; fails for references without DOIs

    From 2 comments
    • This looks useful but one thing I've found is that with papers with multiple meta-data sources, some sources are much better than others. That and chasing down references without…
      ska on HN
    • Yes, I frequently encounter references which have no DOI and often aren't even online. A system which is based entirely around DOIs is going to be of limited utility to me.
      btrettel on HN
  • Metadata sources vary in quality

    From 1 comment
    • This looks useful but one thing I've found is that with papers with multiple meta-data sources, some sources are much better than others. That and chasing down references without…
      ska on HN

Requests

  • Support references without DOIs

    From 1 comment
    • Yes, I frequently encounter references which have no DOI and often aren't even online. A system which is based entirely around DOIs is going to be of limited utility to me.
      btrettel on HN

Questions

  • What reference manager alternatives exist after CiteULike

    From 2 comments
    • I'm a refugee from the late, lamented CiteULike. I have tried to like zotero and mendeley, but neither of them grab me like C-U-L did. Dinosaur that I am, I am currently using…
      fghorow on HN
    • I am also a CUL refugee who is using JabRef after trying Zotero. Would be interested to know if there are any other options.
      tnhh on HN

Alternatives named

  • Zotero

    From 3 comments
    • Very neat, when I was writing my thesis I used zotero and its firefox downloader plugin which was a heck of a lot better than dealing with the biography process manually but…
      osamagirl69 on HN
    • I use Zotero for references but keep the files in a separate organized directory structure, where the filenames match the citation key in Zotero. Each approach has its own…
      btrettel on HN
    • I really love the idea of ditching reference managers. The utility of these three scripts (or something like them) really is demonstrated when on mobile. RSS feeds, Twitter (or…
      hirenj on HN
  • JabRef

    From 1 comment
    • I'm a refugee from the late, lamented CiteULike. I have tried to like zotero and mendeley, but neither of them grab me like C-U-L did. Dinosaur that I am, I am currently using…
      fghorow on HN
  • Mendeley

    From 1 comment
    • I'm a refugee from the late, lamented CiteULike. I have tried to like zotero and mendeley, but neither of them grab me like C-U-L did. Dinosaur that I am, I am currently using…
      fghorow on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/21545291)