git-rename-master-branch-to-main

Dev tools

git tooling

SHOW HN2020

6points
8comments
#2,758of 3,028 in 2020
Top 92%of 2020 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

0 positive, 3 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 3 critical, out of 6 comments about the project. Thread score -0.31.

Execution: 0 for, 2 againstIdea: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

Objections

  • Renaming words does not solve the underlying problems

    From 1 comment
    • rename things doesn’t solve the problems, there are no bad words just bad intentions
      aayala on HN
  • Repository itself still used a master branch

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • What must others with master checked out do after the rename?

    From 1 comment
    • What needs to be done for other people who've checked out the repo on the master branch?
      tlb on HN
  • Why rename the master branch at all?

    From 1 comment
    • I have noticed a lot of people talking about this change. Can anybody explain why we would want to rename the master branch? The only articles I see online are people claiming…
      g105b on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/23697797)