Synergy
Languages and libraries
ui library
SHOW HN2021
How HN took it
14 positive, 25 neutral or asking, 4 mixed, 10 critical, out of 53 comments about the project. Thread score +0.00.
Idea: 3 for, 5 againstDesign: 3 for, 1 againstExecution: 0 for, 2 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 against
The thread, comment by comment
Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.
positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker
What HN said
What people liked
Clean, well documented docs
From 2 comments
I really like this project, especially when going through the docs. Nearly all the abstractions are very clean in their approach, the only outlier being the hack of using `#each`…
mjgoeke on HNThis looks surprisingly well documented for such a tiny project, and reasonably complete for such a tiny runtime. Nicely done! :)
chrisweekly on HN
Packs a lot into 4kb
From 1 comment
Skimmed through the docs. Some thoughts: - it has a bunch of useful serialization sugar (e.g. `{{ classes }}` serializes correctly whether it's an array, an object of booleans,…
lhorie on HN
Objections
Name conflicts with existing Synergy packages
From 1 comment
Just noticed there is already existing another Synergy framework and "Synergy" package. Probably better to rename the library to avoid confusion. By the way, in terms of bundle…
alexey2020 on HN
Nested loops and loop index handling are limited
From 2 comments
Skimmed through the docs. Some thoughts: - it has a bunch of useful serialization sugar (e.g. `{{ classes }}` serializes correctly whether it's an array, an object of booleans,…
lhorie on HNRe the '#', yes - this is currently a limitation and will be addressed, most likely with destructuring syntax for the repeated block declaration (e.g., #each [i, item] in items)
defx on HN
Landing page and description are too minimal
From 1 comment
You should work on your landing. I really appreciate the idea and I personal feel the minimalistic design you have behind this concept and the landing page it try to promote, but…
Cyber_squad on HN
Requests
Tutorials and more docs
From 2 comments
Skimmed through the docs. Some thoughts: - it has a bunch of useful serialization sugar (e.g. `{{ classes }}` serializes correctly whether it's an array, an object of booleans,…
lhorie on HNYou should work on your landing. I really appreciate the idea and I personal feel the minimalistic design you have behind this concept and the landing page it try to promote, but…
Cyber_squad on HN
Better SSR or prerendering approach
From 1 comment
Skimmed through the docs. Some thoughts: - it has a bunch of useful serialization sugar (e.g. `{{ classes }}` serializes correctly whether it's an array, an object of booleans,…
lhorie on HN
Questions
How it compares with Preact and Svelte
From 2 comments
How does it compare with Preact? https://preactjs.com/ I tried Preact a few weeks ago and the examples all worked, which was nice. And there's no build step -- you can develop…
chubot on HNLooks nice. Svelte is also <4kb, but it is compiled.
turtlebits on HN
Whether it suits full single page apps
From 1 comment
I really like this project, especially when going through the docs. Nearly all the abstractions are very clean in their approach, the only outlier being the hack of using `#each`…
mjgoeke on HN
Alternatives named
Preact
From 2 comments
How does it compare with Preact? https://preactjs.com/ I tried Preact a few weeks ago and the examples all worked, which was nice. And there's no build step -- you can develop…
chubot on HNpreact (https://preactjs.com/) is 3kB... And React is only about 5kB unless I'm mistaken?
remram on HN
Svelte
From 1 comment
Looks nice. Svelte is also <4kb, but it is compiled.
turtlebits on HN
Alpine.js
From 1 comment
Hi, how is your project different from alpine.js?
vldmrs on HN
LitElement
From 1 comment
Isn't it LitElement reinvented?
lolive on HN