Beacon

Security and privacy

privacy browser

SHOW HN2021

47points
19comments
#890of 2,533 in 2021
Top 36%of 2021 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

1 positive, 6 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 5 critical, out of 12 comments about the project. Thread score -0.35.

Idea: 0 for, 3 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Explanation of WebKit-based certificate pinning was clear

    From 1 comment

Objections

  • DANE/DNSSEC is a poor fit for TLS trust; browsers won't support it

    From 3 comments
    • This standard is DOA. https://blog.apnic.net/2019/05/27/dns-oarc-30-bad-news-for-dane/ An explainer: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20026572
      tptacek on HN
    • Browser vendors (notably Chromium) have already acknowledged that the best they'll be able to do is treat DANE like another CA, which leaves open the question of why they'd…
      tptacek on HN
    • paging @tptacek (really hope there is more on DNSSEC in your upcoming SCW episodes because clearly the world needs it) I was out the moment I read the project bets on DNSSEC/DANE…
      DyslexicAtheist on HN
  • Proof-of-work blockchain has environmental cost

    From 1 comment
    • "Handshake leverages a blockchain based on unspent transaction output (UTXO) and proof-of-work (PoW) similar to Bitcoin for naming capabilities." This means it intentionally…
      skyfaller on HN
  • iOS-only at launch; title should say iOS

    From 1 comment
  • Unclear which engine Android and desktop versions would use; may be a Chromium clone

    From 1 comment
    • I don't quite get what engine it's gonna use on android and desktop. If it's yet another clone of chromium, then it's not really anything new.
      vort3 on HN

Requests

  • Android and desktop versions

    From 2 comments
  • Latency data for TTFB impact

    From 1 comment
  • Implement RFC9102 DNSSEC chain extension

    From 1 comment
    • Something to consider in the future is implementing RFC9102[0] which is an experimental TLS extension for embedding the DNSSEC chain this should significantly improve TTFB. It'll…
      buffrr on HN

Questions

  • How does the browser work on iOS given WebKit requirement

    From 1 comment
    • Hm, how does this work with that iOS always run browsers using Safari webview? Doesn't this need a native browser implementation for the handshake and p2p to be secure?
      tmikaeld on HN
  • Which engine for Android and desktop

    From 1 comment
    • I don't quite get what engine it's gonna use on android and desktop. If it's yet another clone of chromium, then it's not really anything new.
      vort3 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/29553848)