Open-Sourcing InboxSDK (YC S11)

Dev tools

browser extension sdk

SHOW HN2022

257points
55comments
#183of 2,570 in 2022
Top 8%of 2022 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

12 positive, 14 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 6 critical, out of 33 comments about the project. Thread score +0.27.

Execution: 4 for, 0 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 2 againstIdea: 0 for, 2 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Saves developers from DOM hacking and Gmail compatibility work

    From 2 comments
    • When I was a product leader at Dropbox back in 2015, we chose to build our Gmail integration on the InboxSDK and we're generally happy we did. It let us focus on our core user…
      matt_holden on HN
    • This is awesome news! My team built the first version of the Pipedrive Gmail extension [1] and Inbox SDK was [2] instrumental to getting it to work we wanted to: among other…
      nip on HN
  • Open sourcing is welcomed

    From 2 comments
    • Nice move open-sourcing it. At the company I work for, we considered InboxSDK when making an Gmail-integrating extension. But at the time it was closed-source so we went with the…
      josteink on HN
    • Amazing news! InboxSDK is amazing and now it's even more awesome.
      usamaejaz on HN

Objections

  • App ID reporting to the maker's servers raises privacy concerns

    From 2 comments
    • InboxSDK is very nice. However my personal stopper is the use of YOUR_APP_ID_HERE for broadcasting to mothership. Didnt check the source code fully for a while. 1. hello-world…
      adeptima on HN
    • Wow. This is bad in so many ways. Hasn't nobody made a truly free as in freedom fork?
      worewood on HN
  • No Firefox support

    From 2 comments
  • Locks users into Gmail rather than open mail standards

    From 1 comment
    • > Over 1.8B users spend their days in Gmail! Way to absolutely depress me one paragraph in. It's really unfortunate to see a whole ecosystem trying to ossify this problem with…
      ocdtrekkie on HN

Requests

  • Make the app ID opaque or optional

    From 2 comments
    • The fundamental motivation for the app id concept is that part of the value that InboxSDK provides is cushioning the developer from version conflicts, both from Gmail updates and…
      frew on HN
    • Fred, your comment is greatly appreciated! Will investigate more
      adeptima on HN
  • Firefox support

    From 2 comments
    • I don't believe so, but we target everything in the Webkit ecosystem (Chrome, Edge, Safari), so Firefox would be the only odd browser out.
      frew on HN
    • Any chance Firefox support is on the roadmap?
      michaelmior on HN
  • Status page for SDK changes

    From 1 comment
    • This is incredible! A few years ago we used InboxSDK to build a custom interface to visualize all kinds of interaction information from a corporate database, based on a currently…
      btown on HN

Questions

  • Does it work with Manifest V3?

    From 2 comments
  • Does it work with TamperMonkey?

    From 2 comments
    • This is interesting. We're shifting away from browser extensions to TamperMonkey scripts because of the futility of trying to get everyone in the company to use the same browser.…
      bilalq on HN
    • I don't believe so, but we target everything in the Webkit ecosystem (Chrome, Edge, Safari), so Firefox would be the only odd browser out.
      frew on HN
  • Risk of Google blocking accounts?

    From 2 comments
    • Is there a higher risk of the user's account being blocked by Google after using this?
      soco on HN
    • We haven't seen that at all. 10's of millions of users have used apps built on this SDK. I think the reason it isn't an issue is because Gmail (the client/server) doesn't really…
      alooPotato on HN

Alternatives named

  • Gmail.js

    From 3 comments
    • Nice move open-sourcing it. At the company I work for, we considered InboxSDK when making an Gmail-integrating extension. But at the time it was closed-source so we went with the…
      josteink on HN
    • Same this side. We are happy user of Gmail.js[1] [1] https://github.com/KartikTalwar/gmail.js
      koolhead17 on HN
    • This is actually great, we use aria labels at inboxpirates.com to extract most of the Gmail data. Saw this and Gmail Js (https://github.com/KartikTalwar/gmail.js/) It seems more…
      goforbg on HN
  • Missive and Front

    From 2 comments
    • I love Streak for singleplayer but prefer Missive or Front for collaboration. It would be awesome if someone can turn Gmail into a collaboration hub like https://missiveapp.com/…
      samuelstros on HN
    • how do missive and front compare to each other? Do you find one superior?
      kak9 on HN
  • Hey.com

    From 2 comments
    • Yes there are lots of users of Gmail. But I feel like email in general is one of the more open protocols we have. I understand it's hard to self host nowadays but at least it's…
      alooPotato on HN
    • Will it be possible to create a 'allow/disallow list'? I have been dreaming of an inbox where I can block all incoming emails by default. A separate page shows tags of incoming…
      fillskills on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/33164922)