Checksum

Dev tools

end-to-end testing

SHOW HN2023

78points
32comments
#809of 3,109 in 2023
Top 27%of 2023 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

4 positive, 4 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 9 critical, out of 18 comments about the project. Thread score -0.25.

Idea: 2 for, 3 againstDocs: 1 for, 1 againstExecution: 0 for, 2 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Idea seen as promising and interesting.

    From 3 comments
    • Congratulations on all the progress you've made! We are all learning as we're building and talking to users. I know for my team, E2E/Integration testing is our main priority…
      jtambunt on HN
    • Awesome idea! Excited to see where this goes
      execore-1 on HN
    • Congrats! Definitely think QA farms can be automated using AI! Can you explain more what part Checksum is using AI? Is it for the identification of user sessions that are good…
      varunjain99 on HN

Objections

  • Name 'Checksum' suggests crypto/security rather than testing.

    From 1 comment
    • This is dope, a couple of feedback points from a technical person that is a potential customer (I could be wrong on these!): -- I think the name doesn't sell me or even most…
      therealrifath on HN
  • Unclear how the AI verifies correct behavior and bugs without human oracles.

    From 3 comments
    • Most tool companies making claims about their tools show a shocking lack of knowledge about testing. This generally guarantees that their tools are dismissed by serious…
      satisfice on HN
    • So you are saying that your system needs me to do all the testing (it is infeasible to watch our users, because we test the product before it is released to any users) so it can…
      satisfice on HN
    • How is the product different from the other test generation tools? How do you check if the are testing the intended behavior. My experience with automated testing solutions has…
      sachuin23 on HN
  • Privacy handling of user session data, especially for HIPAA-type apps.

    From 2 comments
    • How do you know what data is sensitive, and how do you anonymize? Thinking of apps that might fall under HIPAA etc
      afro88 on HN
    • That's a great question! We actually use real user sessions to train our model, so when I use the term coverage our main metric is covering as many user behaviors as possible. We…
      Bootstrapper909 on HN
  • No pricing published on the site.

    From 1 comment
    • Nothing on pricing on your site. Makes any other question difficult to formulate.
      BillSaysThis on HN
  • Performance claims were vague.

    From 1 comment
    • > Our impact on performance is non-existent as we use battle-tested open source tools used by Fortune 500 companies What does that mean, exactly? Just because it's open source…
      ezekg on HN

Requests

  • Show example generated tests and a demo of setup and passing tests.

    From 2 comments
    • This is a really compelling idea – but I'm having a little trouble making the leap from the high level description to what it would mean for my projects in more concrete terms.…
      JohnFriel on HN
    • This is dope, a couple of feedback points from a technical person that is a potential customer (I could be wrong on these!): -- I think the name doesn't sell me or even most…
      therealrifath on HN
  • Support for mobile apps such as React Native.

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • How does the model handle edge cases absent from training sessions?

    From 1 comment
    • If this is trained on user sessions, how would the model learn to generate tests for edge cases that wouldn’t necessarily show up in the training data?
      johnhenning on HN
  • How does the system decide a test passed, and how does it handle UI changes?

    From 2 comments
    • congrats on the launch. 0 - seriously rethink your branding. I can help. 1 - how does the Ai know when the test is successful? — is it a visual comparison? — if so.. is there a…
      artur_makly on HN
    • Most tool companies making claims about their tools show a shocking lack of knowledge about testing. This generally guarantees that their tools are dismissed by serious…
      satisfice on HN
  • How does it differ from other test generation tools?

    From 2 comments
    • How is the product different from the other test generation tools? How do you check if the are testing the intended behavior. My experience with automated testing solutions has…
      sachuin23 on HN
    • congrats on the launch. 0 - seriously rethink your branding. I can help. 1 - how does the Ai know when the test is successful? — is it a visual comparison? — if so.. is there a…
      artur_makly on HN

Alternatives named

  • Meticulous.ai

    From 1 comment
    • congrats on the launch. 0 - seriously rethink your branding. I can help. 1 - how does the Ai know when the test is successful? — is it a visual comparison? — if so.. is there a…
      artur_makly on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/35629050)