friggeri.net

Data

political voting visualization

SHOW HN2012

95points
39comments
#230of 1,677 in 2012
Top 14%of 2012 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

5 positive, 9 neutral or asking, 3 mixed, 1 critical, out of 18 comments about the project. Thread score +0.22.

Design: 3 for, 1 againstExecution: 1 for, 0 againstIdea: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Visualization looks nice and well done

    From 3 comments
    • It does look nice... and it does raise interesting questions. I'm particularly intrigued as to John Kerry, John Edwards, and Joe Lieberman's presences in that anomalous 108th…
      EvilTerran on HN
    • Best use of SVG I have seen yet!
      LyleK on HN
    • Looks really great and seems like a useful tool. My only real complaint, is that I use a high sensitivity on my mouse and I found it difficult to highlight a line. If you could…
      pacmon on HN
  • Useful tool

    From 1 comment
    • Looks really great and seems like a useful tool. My only real complaint, is that I use a high sensitivity on my mouse and I found it difficult to highlight a line. If you could…
      pacmon on HN

Objections

  • Left-right placement of parties is reversed

    From 1 comment
    • It's very good, but suffers from one basic presentational error: You've placed Republicans on the left and Democrats on the right. While I know your algorithm doesn't attempt to…
      anigbrowl on HN
  • Groups are hard to select with a high-sensitivity mouse and lines are thin

    From 1 comment
    • Looks really great and seems like a useful tool. My only real complaint, is that I use a high sensitivity on my mouse and I found it difficult to highlight a line. If you could…
      pacmon on HN
  • Background bars too light and branching lines unclear

    From 1 comment
    • For what it's worth, I thought the gray background bars were far too light - it took me a while to find them. I also couldn't intuit what the branching lines were all about.…
      sesqu on HN

Requests

  • Explain the algorithm and how agreement groups are defined

    From 3 comments
    • It does look nice... and it does raise interesting questions. I'm particularly intrigued as to John Kerry, John Edwards, and Joe Lieberman's presences in that anomalous 108th…
      EvilTerran on HN
    • Here's a screenshot from my Chrome 18 on Linux: http://i.imgur.com/vPwl8.png The visualization is quite nice, and it would be useful to link to or include some kind of short…
      sesqu on HN
    • Good stuff. Can you talk more about the algorithm? Can you use this to detect issue clusters rather than voting clusters? I have tried to build subgroup-in-graph detectors with…
      joshu on HN
  • Apply the method per issue rather than per vote

    From 3 comments
    • Good stuff. Can you talk more about the algorithm? Can you use this to detect issue clusters rather than voting clusters? I have tried to build subgroup-in-graph detectors with…
      joshu on HN
    • Great stuff. Thanks for sharing. It'd be great to apply your algorithm per issue. During Camp Wellstone training (grassroots political organizing), they taught us a tool called a…
      specialist on HN
    • You have a bipartite graph of bills and representatives. You use co-voting for the similarity metric to cluster representatives. Flip that around and cluster the bills using…
      joshu on HN
  • Account for reelection cycles and party control

    From 1 comment
    • Which sets of Senators were facing election that year? As a rule, only approximately a third. It would be nice to see if they were correlated to the group "switching" sides.…
      msg on HN

Questions

  • Why Democrats appear in the Republican group in the 108th Congress

    From 2 comments
    • > One unexplicable point remains in the data and that is the presence of 18 Democrats in the Republican group of the 108th Congress. Dude, check the dates. Two words: Iraq…
      toyg on HN
    • It does look nice... and it does raise interesting questions. I'm particularly intrigued as to John Kerry, John Edwards, and Joe Lieberman's presences in that anomalous 108th…
      EvilTerran on HN
  • How agreement groups are defined

    From 1 comment
    • It does look nice... and it does raise interesting questions. I'm particularly intrigued as to John Kerry, John Edwards, and Joe Lieberman's presences in that anomalous 108th…
      EvilTerran on HN

Alternatives named

  • Sankey diagrams and Minard's Napoleon map

    From 1 comment
    • I was not aware of this xkcd comic, funny how things seem to pop out. My inspiration was more in the line of Sankey diagrams. Among others, the famous map of Napoleon's invasion…
      friggeri on HN
  • XKCD comic 657

    From 1 comment
    • It does look nice... and it does raise interesting questions. I'm particularly intrigued as to John Kerry, John Edwards, and Joe Lieberman's presences in that anomalous 108th…
      EvilTerran on HN
  • Simon Jackman ideal point estimates

    From 1 comment
    • Simon Jackman calculates ideal point estimates based on non-unanimous roll calls: http://jackman.stanford.edu/ideal/currentSenate/x1.pdf I think his R source is available too.
      caf on HN
  • Principal component analysis of Senate voting

    From 1 comment
    • Would be interesting to see PCA and CA* applied to the same data. On a quick google trip I found [1] Principal Component Analysis of Senate Voting Patterns…
      drx on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/3901058)