Ubicloud
Infrastructure
ci runners
SHOW HN2024
How HN took it
13 positive, 31 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 7 critical, out of 52 comments about the project. Thread score +0.09.
Pricing: 4 for, 1 againstDesign: 1 for, 1 againstDocs: 1 for, 1 againstPrivacy: 1 for, 1 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 against
The thread, comment by comment
Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.
positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker
What HN said
What people liked
Large cost savings on CI bills
From 3 comments
We've been using Ubicloud builders for our Rust project [0] for several months, and it's worked very well. We've seen CI times go from 10-15 minutes to 6-7, and our bill has gone…
necubi on HNWe've been running Ubicloud for a while at Resmo. It is indeed 10x cheaper. We upped our instance sizes by 2x for a slightly more performance but it's still 5x cheaper. The main…
CSDude on HNWe've been using the Ubicloud runner for a while at PeerDB[1]. Great value and specially the ARM runners have been helpful to get our CI costs down. The team is really responsive…
cauchyk on HN
Responsive team that adds requested features
From 1 comment
We've been using the Ubicloud runner for a while at PeerDB[1]. Great value and specially the ARM runners have been helpful to get our CI costs down. The team is really responsive…
cauchyk on HN
Objections
No caching support yet; slow cache transfers from GitHub
From 3 comments
In this case, I don't think the issue is due to filesystem performance. Someone from Ubicloud can correct me, but my understanding is that for custom runners Github still stores…
necubi on HNdidn't see any mention of caching in the docs. This tends to be pretty important for fast build/CI at many different key points of a given workflow (dependency cache, build…
fierro on HNHi, I work for Ubicloud. Yes, that is correct. We are also working on implementing our own caching, which should speed up cache downloads/uploads significantly.
pwmtr on HN
No macOS runners
From 2 comments
Our biggest GHA fees come from running on MacOS. Do you offer MacOS as a managed service (or plan to?) and how much cheaper is that than GitHub?
hangonhn on HNNot for the foreseeable future. Ubicloud runs on bare metal providers and they don't lease Mac hardware. Technically, we could run MacOS VMs on arm64. However, our interpretation…
ozgune on HN
No SOC2 or compliance certification
From 2 comments
Nice intro, but I am a bit worried not seeing SOC2 or something similar.
jovezhong on HNSOC2 ?
roboben on HN
Requests
macOS runner support
From 2 comments
Our biggest GHA fees come from running on MacOS. Do you offer MacOS as a managed service (or plan to?) and how much cheaper is that than GitHub?
hangonhn on HNI was looking for macOS M1 runner, which is not provided by GitHub. I'm willing to pay for that, but it seems that there are only Linux types now.
ospider on HN
Windows runner support
From 1 comment
This looks great and the pricing is obviously a big improvement, I will try it out for our Linux jobs. Sure would be good to see competition for the MacOS and Windows runners…
tmpfs on HN
Caching layer
From 2 comments
didn't see any mention of caching in the docs. This tends to be pretty important for fast build/CI at many different key points of a given workflow (dependency cache, build…
fierro on HNHi there, I'm Ozgun, one of Ubicloud's founders. We have dozens of customers using Ubicloud runners in production today. We’re now designing our caching layer (Docker instance…
ozgune on HN
Questions
Is the block storage wiped so data cannot be recovered?
From 1 comment
> wipe out the block storage device attached to the VM Does this provide guarantee that subsequent job won't be able to recover the data?
kburman on HN
Where is the company incorporated and is it GDPR compliant?
From 1 comment
Where is your company incorporated? (e.g do you comply with the GDPR?). This should be stated on the website.
fermigier on HN
Does it use on-demand workers or a long-running node?
From 1 comment
Looks like it's a long running node? Or am I wrong? Does it have on demand workers like those Kubernetes providers, where you use shared master nodes (or with a very small fee),…
commonenemy on HN
Alternatives named
BuildJet
From 2 comments
We've been happily using BuildJet [0] for over a year now. Saved over $25k in CI costs compared to GH Actions - they're also using super powerful bare metal servers with Hetzner…
thomasisaac on HNHow does this compare to BuildJet?
forks on HN
WarpBuild
From 1 comment
We support GitHub MacOS 13 runners on M2 Pros at WarpBuild [1]. They're about 25% faster and 50% cheaper per minute compared to the equivalent GitHub hosted runners. [1]…
suryao on HN
RunsOn
From 1 comment
I love to see examples in the wild of repos having switched to a non-official GitHub Action runner. I'm slowly preparing a collection of repo timings comparing GitHub vs…
crohr on HN
Cirun
From 1 comment
Thanks for sharing, looks cool! The one I have been using on all of my projects is https://cirun.io they support all cloud providers and have been around for almost as long as…
ipshii on HN
philips-labs terraform-aws-github-runner
From 1 comment
Looks neat. I've been using https://github.com/philips-labs/terraform-aws-github-runner to save on $
syassami on HN