Serverless Postgres

Data

serverless postgres

SHOW HN2024

159points
61comments
#527of 3,515 in 2024
Top 15%of 2024 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

3 positive, 17 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 8 critical, out of 28 comments about the project. Thread score -0.12.

Idea: 3 for, 5 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 againstExecution: 0 for, 1 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Nifty idea conceptually

    From 1 comment
    • This seems more like "PostgreSQL using remote storage for the database" rather than "Serverless"? It seems like it still needs memory/cpu resources locally (sized properly) to…
      justinclift on HN
  • Good for infrequent access and cheap database-per-tenant

    From 1 comment
    • In addition to infrequent access type use-cases, the ability to trivially create new DBs without incurring significant costs is the killer feature. This makes it feasible to…
      AgharaShyam on HN

Objections

  • Not truly serverless by common definition

    From 2 comments
    • > I guess the term “Serverless” is pretty ambiguous, (...) I don't this is the case though. The core principle of serverless computing is that a cloud provider supplies a managed…
      chipdart on HN
    • I use Fly.io, it’s not serverless at all, it’s a PaaS that manages your servers for you via its own automations and cli. Fly also already supports postgres (I use this too) so…
      davedx on HN
  • Risk of large egress bills on AWS

    From 1 comment
    • This seems more like "PostgreSQL using remote storage for the database" rather than "Serverless"? It seems like it still needs memory/cpu resources locally (sized properly) to…
      justinclift on HN
  • Single node only; not horizontally scalable

    From 1 comment
    • Neon has a consensus cluster of >=3 WAL storage servers using local storage that is not scale-to-zero. Only with multitenancy can you amortize it to scale-down-to-not-much. It's…
      yencabulator on HN

Questions

  • How does it compare to Neon?

    From 1 comment
    • How does this compare to Neon[1], Crunchy PostgreSQL for Kubernetes[2], and Citus[3]? [1] https://neon.tech / https://github.com/neondatabase/neon [2]…
      sea-gold on HN
  • Can it run on AWS Lambda?

    From 1 comment
    • Can this run on AWS Lambda with a EBS Blockstore? Mentally this is the cheapest w/o all those egress costs, but I'm not sure. Combine that with we don't like managing resources…
      irjustin on HN

Alternatives named

  • Neon

    From 2 comments
    • How does this compare to Neon[1], Crunchy PostgreSQL for Kubernetes[2], and Citus[3]? [1] https://neon.tech / https://github.com/neondatabase/neon [2]…
      sea-gold on HN
    • I think the only relevant comparison here is Neon.
      paulddraper on HN
  • Crunchy Postgres for Kubernetes

    From 1 comment
    • How does this compare to Neon[1], Crunchy PostgreSQL for Kubernetes[2], and Citus[3]? [1] https://neon.tech / https://github.com/neondatabase/neon [2]…
      sea-gold on HN
  • Citus

    From 1 comment
    • How does this compare to Neon[1], Crunchy PostgreSQL for Kubernetes[2], and Citus[3]? [1] https://neon.tech / https://github.com/neondatabase/neon [2]…
      sea-gold on HN
  • PGlite

    From 1 comment
    • check pglite project: https://github.com/electric-sql/pglite
      avinassh on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/40514089)