Shadow IT Scan

Web and SaaS

shadow it scanning

SHOW HN2024

69points
36comments
#1,086of 3,515 in 2024
Top 31%of 2024 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

5 positive, 5 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 4 critical, out of 14 comments about the project. Thread score +0.19.

Design: 0 for, 4 againstIdea: 2 for, 0 againstExecution: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful, accessible security tool that most companies don't know exists

    From 3 comments
    • This is really cool!! Always excited about increased accessibility of security tools. This used to require jumping through a bunch of hoops in the past to find out, so most…
      bdno86 on HN
    • Indeed, when I learned about it I felt stupid for not having somebody run a regular report. Everybody talks about Shadow IT but most companies have a decent option to uncover a…
      PhLR on HN
    • This is very, very cool! Great work guys!
      650REDHAIR on HN
  • Simple to use and powerful compared to alternatives

    From 1 comment
    • In a previous role many years ago I used a tool called Netskope which monitored Firewall traffic and it was excellent at identifying almost every web related service being used.…
      NoPicklez on HN

Objections

  • Hard dependency on Slack limits usefulness and growth

    From 3 comments
    • This severely limits the usefulness of a product like this. Core aspects of the product like workflows and task management should not be tied to a chat vendor in my opinion, and…
      haswell on HN
    • It sounds like you may have found your niche with existing Slack customers and if that works for you that’s great. I don’t agree that this is a “strength”, because it limits the…
      haswell on HN
    • A lot of companies are MS O365/Teams shops.
      akeck on HN
  • Slack-required pricing is confusing if Slack is not used

    From 2 comments
    • > AccessOwl calculates billing based on the number of active Slack users, excluding Single-Channel Guests and service accounts, as this is usually the closest measure to your…
      moxli on HN
    • I don't think that's possible, the "Start Trial" button immediately redirects to Slack. This does seem like a weird restriction. Nothing about the product otherwise seems…
      jorams on HN
  • Logo resembles other brands

    From 2 comments
    • Seeing the logo made me wonder if this was a project spun out of Tripadvisor, they're very similar.
      ctippett on HN
    • Even more confusable with especially the previous logo (but also current branding) of sendowl.com.…
      3np on HN

Requests

  • Support for non-Slack chat tools as an alternative

    From 1 comment
    • Depending on the point of view it can also be a strength. Actually many of our customers like that we're in Slack because their people are already there: - no login required to…
      mathiasn on HN
  • Support for Microsoft Teams environments

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • How does pricing work if Slack is not used?

    From 1 comment
    • > AccessOwl calculates billing based on the number of active Slack users, excluding Single-Channel Guests and service accounts, as this is usually the closest measure to your…
      moxli on HN

Alternatives named

  • Netskope firewall traffic monitoring

    From 1 comment
    • In a previous role many years ago I used a tool called Netskope which monitored Firewall traffic and it was excellent at identifying almost every web related service being used.…
      NoPicklez on HN
  • Browser extensions for discovering shadow IT

    From 1 comment
    • Indeed, there are some great alternatives for discovering Shadow IT, some with more or less overhead (i.e. browser extensions that nobody wants to install).
      PhLR on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/41118468)