AI Code Detector

Dev tools

ai code detection

SHOW HN2025

72points
65comments
#989of 3,837 in 2025
Top 26%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

5 positive, 19 neutral or asking, 3 mixed, 14 critical, out of 41 comments about the project. Thread score -0.28.

Performance: 0 for, 12 againstIdea: 3 for, 1 againstExecution: 1 for, 1 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Impressive results and useful for engineering leaders.

    From 4 comments
    • As a leader this is actually really neat - going to give it a spin
      mechen on HN
    • Just tried. Actually quite impressed with how well it works. I avoid using AI to write code, I'm a little worried that the existence of detection tools like this will lead people…
      ht-syseng on HN
    • My engineers didn’t know how much they used AI for vibe coding until I used Span. Can confirm we were all left with jaws on the floor. Now re-thinking my hiring plan for the next…
      khanna_ayush on HN
    • Just tried it out and it works :mind-blown:
      mechen on HN

Objections

  • 95% accuracy yields too many false positives for consequential use.

    From 2 comments
    • A 95% accuracy is very low for this type of thing. People use this to enact administrative consequences. People's lives are ruined and 5% is too high of a false positive rate.…
      kittikitti on HN
    • I can detect AI-generated code with 100% accuracy, provided you give me an unlimited budget for false positives. It's a bit of a useless metric.
      bigyabai on HN
  • Easy to evade by editing AI code to look human-written.

    From 3 comments
    • I feel like code fed into this detector can be manipulated to increase false positives. The model probably learns patterns that are common in generated text (clean comments, AI…
      mendeza on HN
    • Could I use this to iterate over my AI generated code until it's not detectable anymore? So essentially the moment you publish this tool it stops working?
      jensneuse on HN
    • What if I just modify the code to misspell things that no AI would misspell?
      jakderrida on HN
  • Gave wrong results on human and AI test code.

    From 3 comments
    • It told me my ~10 year old js project was 50% AI generated. Yeah, this is more or less the same as "AI text detector" stuff that won't work reliably (but people who don't…
      yamalight on HN
    • Very cool! I wonder if it performs differently on actual “production” code versus random tests? I opened ChatGPT, typed a random non-sensical prompt, copy-pasted the response[1]…
      simanyay on HN
    • And false negatives. I just pasted 100% AI generated code and it told me it's only 40% AI written.
      thirdacc on HN
  • Only supports TypeScript and Python; other languages missing.

    From 2 comments
    • The maker's post
    • Only Python, TypeScript and JavaScript? Well there go my vibe-coded elisp scripts. I guess it's impossible (or really hard) to train a language-agnostic classifier. Reference,…
      mannicken on HN

Requests

  • Support for Java, Ruby, C# and C.

    From 3 comments
    • Very cool piece of tech, I would suggest putting C on the priority list and then Java. Mainly because Unis and Colleges use one of them or both, so that would be a good use case
      Alifatisk on HN
    • Totally – we have support for Java, C#, and Ruby in the works. Edit: since you mentioned universities, are you thinking about AI detection for student work, e.g. like a…
      johnsillings on HN
    • Glad to hear Ruby is being in the list as well! When it comes to the unis, I was thinking of both AI detection for student work. I mean like plagiarism checkers are common…
      Alifatisk on HN
  • CLI or CI/CD integration.

    From 2 comments
    • Would be amazing to have a CLI tool that detects AI generated code (even add it as part of CI/CD pipelines). I'm tired of all the AI trash PRs
      icemanx on HN
    • It is possible to use this via the command line today. I'll ask Henry to have a look & comment here (or grab a demo and leave a note, we'll give you some more details).
      johnsillings on HN
  • Option to skip comments when analysing code.

    From 1 comment
    • I wonder if you could add a toggle to only examine only source and skip comments.
      jftuga on HN

Questions

  • What is the pricing and is it B2B or B2C?

    From 2 comments
    • what will the pricing be? i guess this is just a super early demo, I want to hear your pricing plan. Also, is this B2B or B2C?
      jimmydin7 on HN
    • You're saying "Understand and report on impact by AI coding tool". How can you drill down into per-coding assistant usage? Also, what's the pricing?
      jjmarr on HN
  • What are precision and recall, and what is the false positive rate?

    From 3 comments
  • Can it show usage per coding assistant?

    From 1 comment
    • You're saying "Understand and report on impact by AI coding tool". How can you drill down into per-coding assistant usage? Also, what's the pricing?
      jjmarr on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/45265831)