instafilter.io

Dev tools

image processing api

SHOW HN2012

47points
26comments
#497of 1,677 in 2012
Top 30%of 2012 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

2 positive, 5 neutral or asking, 4 mixed, 5 critical, out of 16 comments about the project. Thread score -0.17.

Idea: 2 for, 4 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Simple and well executed, fills a real gap

    From 3 comments
    • Fantastic idea. Simple, yet hard enough that it's annoying to do in house.
      alexchamberlain on HN
    • This sounds like a really neat service. Just about a year ago a friend and I wanted to do a filtering app for our own use, but didn't seem to find any straight-forward resources…
      PufferBuffer on HN
    • I think the service looks quite neat, and the effects well done. However, wouldn't it make sense to apply filters client-side in most cases? (I'm personally always a fan of using…
      freditup on HN

Objections

  • Client-side processing is easier and cheaper

    From 3 comments
    • Not to discourage the project (love the interface), but isn’t this far easier to do client side than to send it to a server all the time? If there is a js lib that makes use of…
      Cherian on HN
    • I think the service looks quite neat, and the effects well done. However, wouldn't it make sense to apply filters client-side in most cases? (I'm personally always a fan of using…
      freditup on HN
    • If these kind of nonsense filters really are in demand, doing them in a cloud environment for photographs is insane. Javascript makes much more sense. For video, I could…
      hnriot on HN
  • ImageMagick can do this for free

    From 3 comments
    • wow, this is really expensive for something I can do for free with ImageMagick
      Robby2012 on HN
    • I'm impressed at the features and simplicity, but I'm wondering what the real use cases are. If filters were a core part of my business, I'd certainly be doing them in-house…
      Smudge on HN
    • Can some one explain what the benefit of this over using something like imageMagick? Is there a hidden cost to imageMagick that I am missing?
      jhales on HN
  • Upload and return latency is high

    From 2 comments
    • I think the service looks quite neat, and the effects well done. However, wouldn't it make sense to apply filters client-side in most cases? (I'm personally always a fan of using…
      freditup on HN
    • Great idea. Thought One: Your biggest barrier to adoption will be speed as you scale. If your API returns the modified image too slow, developers will quickly abandon you. So…
      zupreme on HN
  • Filters themselves are nonsense for photography

    From 2 comments
    • If these kind of nonsense filters really are in demand, doing them in a cloud environment for photographs is insane. Javascript makes much more sense. For video, I could…
      hnriot on HN
    • No, not style, I meant medium. These filters are emulating, as do instagrams, different photographic mediums, like color film, b&w film, instant film, etc. Photo filters do not…
      hnriot on HN

Requests

  • Caching of repeated images by checksum

    From 1 comment
    • Great idea. Thought One: Your biggest barrier to adoption will be speed as you scale. If your API returns the modified image too slow, developers will quickly abandon you. So…
      zupreme on HN
  • Gaussian blur filter

    From 1 comment
  • Public filter store for user-generated filters

    From 1 comment
    • Looks very cool! I would also like to point out Cloudinary as a great service that features image hosting & upload in addition to filters. I think Instafilter.io could maybe get…
      jaredcwhite on HN

Questions

  • What are real use cases for this service

    From 2 comments
    • I think the service looks quite neat, and the effects well done. However, wouldn't it make sense to apply filters client-side in most cases? (I'm personally always a fan of using…
      freditup on HN
    • I'm impressed at the features and simplicity, but I'm wondering what the real use cases are. If filters were a core part of my business, I'd certainly be doing them in-house…
      Smudge on HN
  • Does it offer advice on custom filters

    From 1 comment
    • Not to discourage the project (love the interface), but isn’t this far easier to do client side than to send it to a server all the time? If there is a js lib that makes use of…
      Cherian on HN

Alternatives named

  • ImageMagick

    From 3 comments
    • I'm impressed at the features and simplicity, but I'm wondering what the real use cases are. If filters were a core part of my business, I'd certainly be doing them in-house…
      Smudge on HN
    • wow, this is really expensive for something I can do for free with ImageMagick
      Robby2012 on HN
    • Can some one explain what the benefit of this over using something like imageMagick? Is there a hidden cost to imageMagick that I am missing?
      jhales on HN
  • CamanJS

    From 2 comments
  • Cloudinary

    From 1 comment
    • Looks very cool! I would also like to point out Cloudinary as a great service that features image hosting & upload in addition to filters. I think Instafilter.io could maybe get…
      jaredcwhite on HN
  • Client-side canvas filter libraries such as PaintbrushJS, VintageJS, Filtrr

    From 1 comment
  • Cloudflare InstaFlare

    From 1 comment
    • Did you guys see the cloudflare module for this a few months back? http://venturebeat.com/2012/04/20/cloudflare-instaflare-instagram-joke/ also see…
      brianbreslin on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/4539910)