Cuq

Dev tools

formal verification

SHOW HN2025

94points
63comments
#774of 3,837 in 2025
Top 21%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

1 positive, 7 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 8 critical, out of 18 comments about the project. Thread score -0.32.

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Project is pretty cool

    From 1 comment
  • Formal verification for GPU kernels could make massively parallel Rust code safer

    From 1 comment
    • Reading through this thread, it seems the naming debate is taking up most of the oxygen, but the underlying technical goal behind the project is worth highlighting. Formal…
      orliesaurus on HN

Objections

  • The name sounds like a slur or rude word

    From 3 comments
    • This might be the worst named project of all time. Not funny and demonstrates an absolutely terrible impulse on the part of the author. Probably the worst way possible to…
      skrrtww on HN
    • It sounds like cuck.
      jonathrg on HN
    • Yeah, coq is already bad, but cuq is the cherry on top of it. I don't like both.
      7bit on HN
  • Name is distracting from the technical work

    From 2 comments
    • Reading through this thread, it seems the naming debate is taking up most of the oxygen, but the underlying technical goal behind the project is worth highlighting. Formal…
      orliesaurus on HN
    • I wished this name had been reserved for some sort of monitoring software.
      the_real_cher on HN

Requests

  • Rename the project

    From 3 comments
    • This might be the worst named project of all time. Not funny and demonstrates an absolutely terrible impulse on the part of the author. Probably the worst way possible to…
      skrrtww on HN
    • Aren't we more mature than this? Granted, it's the first thing I thought of as well
      ahallock on HN
    • Can we instead please be mature about choosing a adequate sounding name?
      7bit on HN
  • Consider targeting cuTile instead of PTX

    From 1 comment
    • Do you think it might be easier to target cuTile instead of PTX? (Probably not, since it has a less formalized model?)
      gaogao on HN

Questions

  • Is a proof-driven approach scalable beyond toy examples

    From 1 comment
    • Reading through this thread, it seems the naming debate is taking up most of the oxygen, but the underlying technical goal behind the project is worth highlighting. Formal…
      orliesaurus on HN
  • Is the name intentional

    From 2 comments
    • This is pretty cool! Are you sure about the name...
      Hexigonz on HN
    • This might be the worst named project of all time. Not funny and demonstrates an absolutely terrible impulse on the part of the author. Probably the worst way possible to…
      skrrtww on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/45674126)