OCR Arena

AI

ocr model comparison

SHOW HN2025

216points
63comments
#284of 3,837 in 2025
Top 8%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

5 positive, 36 neutral or asking, 3 mixed, 5 critical, out of 49 comments about the project. Thread score -0.01.

Execution: 0 for, 3 againstIdea: 2 for, 1 againstPerformance: 1 for, 0 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful for comparing OCR models; a long-awaited benchmark

    From 3 comments
    • We've got like 10 LLM arenas but nothing for OCR yet, really hope this takes off!
      ylhert on HN
    • This is a killer idea!
      profburial on HN
    • Love this! Would have liked to see something like textract for a pre-LLM benchmark (but of course that's expensive), and also a distinction between handwritten text and printed…
      zzleeper on HN

Objections

  • Accuracy on complex tables is hard to judge; arenas are weak for correctness

    From 2 comments
    • What is needed to evaluate OCR for most business applications (above everything else) is accuracy. Some results look plausible but are just plain wrong. That is worse than…
      molf on HN
    • This is why arenas are generally a bad idea for assessing correctness in visual tasks.
      fzysingularity on HN
  • Bias toward English; no per-language split

    From 2 comments
    • I suggest you make explicit the assumption that this website is specifically about English text. Otherwise the leaderboard is pretty meaningless, with extreme differences in…
      deaux on HN
    • LMArena splits their leaderboard by language: maybe you should consider doing the same thing I assume to do that you’d need another model to do language detection on the inputs…
      skissane on HN
  • Some models hang or loop, and the UI gets stuck

    From 2 comments
    • A limitation of this leaderboard approach that I want to point out is that while the large general-purpose LLMs can make greater leaps of inference (on handwriting and poor…
      daemonologist on HN
    • Really like the idea. Unfortunately, my first upload is still spinning on one of the models about 5 minutes in. Clicking "Stop Battle" seems to do nothing either
      ajmurmann on HN

Requests

  • Add more OCR models such as Mistral, Paddle, Chandra, Landing.ai DPT-2

    From 5 comments
    • Most of these are general LLM’s and not specifically OCR models. Where is Google Vision, Mistral, Paddle, Nanonets, or Chandra??
      codeddesign on HN
    • Please add Chandra by Datalab
      ianhawes on HN
    • Any plans to add Document Pre-trained transformer-2 (DPT-2) from https://landing.ai/?
      densekernel on HN
    • We need to see Landing.ai DPT-2, from my tests its the best in term of ability to extract structure from complex tables so far.
      coulix on HN
    • Would be great to add MistralOCR!
      timbmg on HN
  • Mobile UX fixes and MathJax rendering

    From 2 comments
    • Two suggestions: UX on mobile isn’t great. It wasn’t obvious to me where the second model output was and I was thrown off even more so because the option to vote for model 1…
      ComputerGuru on HN
    • Hey! Dev who made this here. I hear you on the mobile UX, it's on my docket of things to fix. Same with math plugin! Thanks for the suggestions.
      rubikscubeguy on HN
  • Latency and cost metrics alongside quality

    From 2 comments
    • FYI one of the models on the battle was pretty slow to load. Are these also being rated on latency or just quality?
      fzysingularity on HN
    • Ultimately, there’s some intersection of accuracy x cost x speed that’s ideal, which can be different per use case. We’ll surface all of those metrics shortly so that you can…
      kbyatnal on HN
  • Programmatic API access

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • Will traditional OCR tools like Tesseract be added?

    From 1 comment
    • There have been such a large number of OCR tools pop up over the past ~year; sorely in need for some benchmarks to compare them. Would love to see support for normal OCR tools…
      cdrini on HN

Alternatives named

  • Chandra, MinerU, Azure Document Intelligence, Landing.ai DPT-2

    From 4 comments
    • Please add Chandra by Datalab
      ianhawes on HN
    • cool UI and lets anyone upload a doc. but lacks https://github.com/opendatalab/mineru
      vdm on HN
    • Nice! Would love to see Azure Document Intelligence on this
      athoscouto on HN
    • We need to see Landing.ai DPT-2, from my tests its the best in term of ability to extract structure from complex tables so far.
      coulix on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/46006104)