AlgoDrill

Learning and science

coding interview prep

SHOW HN2025

178points
108comments
#380of 3,837 in 2025
Top 10%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

3 positive, 9 neutral or asking, 9 mixed, 21 critical, out of 42 comments about the project. Thread score -0.35.

Pricing: 0 for, 6 againstIdea: 1 for, 5 againstExecution: 0 for, 5 againstDesign: 1 for, 3 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Drill style approach seems helpful for retention

    From 3 comments
    • I like the idea, and you've got yourself a customer :) The lifetime membership + launch discount was a good marketing bait I felt for. Not really understanding the negativity…
      epolanski on HN
    • Solid platform - clean and useful for algorithm practice. Quick suggestions: ``` - GitHub OAuth would feel natural for devs. - Broaden language support (C#, TypeScript, Ruby). -…
      bochoh on HN
    • I like it. I subscribed. The check is definitely rough around the edges though. Memorizing the exact variable names is tough. I think the objectives should maybe give you the…
      hinicholas on HN
  • Clean and useful site

    From 1 comment
    • Solid platform - clean and useful for algorithm practice. Quick suggestions: ``` - GitHub OAuth would feel natural for devs. - Broaden language support (C#, TypeScript, Ruby). -…
      bochoh on HN

Objections

  • Checker requires exact variable names and structure

    From 4 comments
    • What threw me off is the expectation that I use the same variable names and exact same code structure. There are many ways to implement effectively the same thing. I understand…
      michaelmior on HN
    • I want to like this. But... one has to write the answer in EXACTLY the same format, down to each variable name it seems?
      quibono on HN
    • Bought it but please fix the variable names issue mentioned by other people here
      davidbensoussan on HN
    • I like it. I subscribed. The check is definitely rough around the edges though. Memorizing the exact variable names is tough. I think the objectives should maybe give you the…
      hinicholas on HN
  • Fake urgency marketing (claimed spots and percentages)

    From 2 comments
    • Some feedback: The drill style approach seems helpful, but needing the variable names to exactly match threw me off. It would be great if we could _relax_ this constraint via a…
      firsttracks on HN
    • This project has potential but there are some issues with "Marketing" (I call this lying depending on how it's done) Please stop with the false urgency and borderline lying to…
      inesranzo on HN
  • Only Python supported; no JavaScript, TypeScript or other languages yet

    From 3 comments
    • I like the idea, and you've got yourself a customer :) The lifetime membership + launch discount was a good marketing bait I felt for. Not really understanding the negativity…
      epolanski on HN
    • The website is missing information on which languages it supports. I was hoping for Typescript, but after registering I see that it's only Python at the moment and it seems Java…
      AidenVennis on HN
    • Rust version?
      clbrmbr on HN
  • Google-only sign in is a blocker

    From 2 comments
    • I understand the pragmatic reasons behind such a decision, but insisting that I sign up with Google (and only Google) was an unfortunate blocker. If anything, GitHub seems like a…
      monooso on HN
    • Is there any way to try it without signing in via Google?
      stack_framer on HN

Requests

  • Support more languages such as JavaScript and TypeScript

    From 3 comments
    • I like the idea, and you've got yourself a customer :) The lifetime membership + launch discount was a good marketing bait I felt for. Not really understanding the negativity…
      epolanski on HN
    • The website is missing information on which languages it supports. I was hoping for Typescript, but after registering I see that it's only Python at the moment and it seems Java…
      AidenVennis on HN
    • Solid platform - clean and useful for algorithm practice. Quick suggestions: ``` - GitHub OAuth would feel natural for devs. - Broaden language support (C#, TypeScript, Ruby). -…
      bochoh on HN
  • Accept user's own variable names and code structure

    From 2 comments
    • What threw me off is the expectation that I use the same variable names and exact same code structure. There are many ways to implement effectively the same thing. I understand…
      michaelmior on HN
    • Bought it but please fix the variable names issue mentioned by other people here
      davidbensoussan on HN
  • GitHub sign in

    From 2 comments
    • I understand the pragmatic reasons behind such a decision, but insisting that I sign up with Google (and only Google) was an unfortunate blocker. If anything, GitHub seems like a…
      monooso on HN
    • Solid platform - clean and useful for algorithm practice. Quick suggestions: ``` - GitHub OAuth would feel natural for devs. - Broaden language support (C#, TypeScript, Ruby). -…
      bochoh on HN
  • Dark/light mode toggle

    From 1 comment
    • Solid platform - clean and useful for algorithm practice. Quick suggestions: ``` - GitHub OAuth would feel natural for devs. - Broaden language support (C#, TypeScript, Ruby). -…
      bochoh on HN

Questions

  • Is this like Anki or spaced repetition?

    From 1 comment
    • Is it correctly understood that this is Anki for a subset of leetcode problems with study notes? I bit more info on what NeetCode is, why I should focus on those 150 problems and…
      wodenokoto on HN
  • Why is text selection disabled in study mode?

    From 1 comment
    • Why is text selection disabled in study mode? Is this an intentional design choice?
      skydan on HN
  • Is the value of learning LeetCode patterns real for work?

    From 2 comments
    • Actually curious, how often do you find uses for LeetCode patterns in your actual work?
      nialv7 on HN
    • ...the f?! why are we interviewing ppl for things like this?! you either: (a) want DEEP understanding of math and proofs behind algorithms etc. (b) can get away with very high…
      dragochat on HN

Alternatives named

  • NeetCode

    From 1 comment
    • Is it correctly understood that this is Anki for a subset of leetcode problems with study notes? I bit more info on what NeetCode is, why I should focus on those 150 problems and…
      wodenokoto on HN
  • Woodpecker method in chess

    From 1 comment
    • Seems like a good idea, is it the same kind of concept as the woodpecker method in chess ?
      francoispiquard on HN
  • Nemorize

    From 1 comment
  • An Excel sheet

    From 1 comment
    • This is a good product, the mechanism for me was an excel sheet. I wont sign up though, I've ground enough LC. These days I dont even prep for algorithm rounds and still manage…
      another_twist on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/46203581)