Mediator.ai

AI

ai mediation

SHOW HN2026

160points
74comments
#391of 4,366 in 2026
Top 9%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

8 positive, 10 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 11 critical, out of 31 comments about the project. Thread score -0.07.

Idea: 6 for, 10 againstExecution: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Interesting and useful application of LLMs and Nash bargaining

    From 3 comments
    • definitely a great use of LLMs
      setnone on HN
    • Brilliant idea. Congratulations, and good luck.
      libertyit on HN
    • John Nash's ideas are still relevant today - highlights how great he was - I liked how you used a genetic algorithm here!
      dhruv3006 on HN

Objections

  • Mediation is mostly human and emotional, not computed fairness

    From 2 comments
    • Mediator here. This comes from a fundamental misunderstanding of what mediation is for. Mediation is about helping the disputants find a solution they can live with, but…
      Procrastes on HN
    • /Agree As a long time techie I understand the desire to approach mediation as a programmatic systems problem, but as a mediator, I'd recommend OP work as a volunteer mediator…
      anonthrownaway on HN
  • Defining fairness and formalizing preferences involves assumptions

    From 2 comments
    • Feels like the tricky part here isn’t computing a “fair” outcome, but defining what fairness even means in the first place. Once you formalize preferences into something…
      aroido-bigcat on HN
    • This doesn't seem to have any notion of power? Coming up with a fair agreement between people who have equal power over the thing they care equally about, isn't that hard. But…
      vintermann on HN
  • Users can overstate preferences to game the outcome

    From 1 comment
    • Interesting idea for sure. I am just thinking, intuitively couldn't I 'game' the mediator by overstating my preference and requirements to achieve a more favorable outcome?
      dennismcwong on HN
  • Bakery example outcome seems unfair and oversimplified

    From 3 comments
    • Honestly I’m on Daniel’s side - they agreed on a 50/50 split, and they’ve both been working their asses off to make the business work. It’s an arrangement that clearly both of…
      mock-possum on HN
    • Yeah I also don't quite understand the example on the homepage... they agreed to 50/50 and then she wanted 70/30 so now they settle on 60/40? Like this doesn't seem like a "fair"…
      AnthonyR on HN
    • The bakery example is interesting, because it's presented as "both sides have been working on this thing and think they should get 50%"... and then the _solution_ is "A path back…
      sarreph on HN

Requests

  • Handle power imbalances and adversarial situations

    From 2 comments
    • This doesn't seem to have any notion of power? Coming up with a fair agreement between people who have equal power over the thing they care equally about, isn't that hard. But…
      vintermann on HN
    • Great idea though I am skeptical it will be adopted in contentious situations without some sort of stick. In amorphous situations where there is just high trust but an aversion…
      lookACamel on HN
  • Account deletion option

    From 1 comment
    • I like the idea and signed up, but the first thing I see is a prompt to purchase credits. I don't have a use-case to try this now, so I won't be using the service again, however…
      parkerside on HN
  • Apply to geopolitical conflicts

    From 1 comment
    • How about Iran/US conflict ? or Israel/Palestine conflict ? Is anyone working on this ? seems like a big win for AI if it can be done.
      mukundesh on HN

Questions

  • How stated versus revealed preferences are handled

    From 1 comment
    • Very interesting! For limitations, I'd add stated vs revealed preference. Currently the system assumes than what people say is what they actually prefer, but that's not always…
      Zababa on HN
  • Whether real users have tried it in difficult situations

    From 1 comment
    • I think this is very useful. I wonder if you have people that actually used in difficult situations? maybe family separations or challenging stuff like that, where I see a lot of…
      webrot on HN

Alternatives named

  • LLMediator research tools for mediation

    From 1 comment
    • Super interesting, thank you for sharing! I have published some research on using LLMs for mediation here: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.16732 and https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.07053…
      hawest on HN
  • Decisionlayer.ai arbitration

    From 1 comment
    • You might try Decisionlayer.ai We built a way to make contracts enforceable and resolve disputes without the high cost of litigation. Specifically, by adding our arbitration…
      wferrell on HN
  • andshake.app

    From 1 comment
    • I built https://andshake.app to prevent the need for conflict resolution… by getting things clear up front. I agree that AI has much to offer in low-stakes agreements to help…
      danieldifficult on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/47835411)