Race to the Bottom

Other

opinion survey

SHOW HN2026

61points
50comments
#1,057of 4,366 in 2026
Top 25%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

4 positive, 9 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 25 critical, out of 38 comments about the project. Thread score -0.50.

Idea: 1 for, 14 againstDesign: 1 for, 10 againstExecution: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Simple and effective hot-or-not style voting

    From 1 comment
    • simple and effective. love the hot or not style for opinions.
      photonair on HN
  • Leaderboard is informative

    From 1 comment
    • Interesting idea -- ran through it for a few minutes and thought the leaderboard was informative. Definitely could expand this!
      Torgin on HN

Objections

  • Industry descriptions are biased and framing skews results

    From 3 comments
    • An interesting experiment could be re-wording some of these and seeing how different the rankings are. So have an alternate card titled "Promoting your country" rather than…
      madamelic on HN
    • The context or description shown for each "industry" is a massive injection of bias. For example, Cannabis is "Cannabis cultivation, dispensaries, and marijuana-related…
      hjkl0 on HN
    • The framing of some of these is interesting. Not a criticism, just an observation. I think many trigger a visceral negative reaction, like animal testing, but most of these can…
      danpalmer on HN
  • Many options are broad or lump good and bad uses together

    From 3 comments
    • An interesting experiment could be re-wording some of these and seeing how different the rankings are. So have an alternate card titled "Promoting your country" rather than…
      madamelic on HN
    • The framing of some of these is interesting. Not a criticism, just an observation. I think many trigger a visceral negative reaction, like animal testing, but most of these can…
      danpalmer on HN
    • Some of these tripped me up as well. Oil & Gas are necessary for a country's survival. Good! The Oil & Gas Industry operate political lobbying and climate change disinformation…
      dlivingston on HN
  • Rankings feel inconsistent and opaque

    From 3 comments
    • Rankings not all consistent: ``` - private military 6 but defense 39; - surveillance tech 7, data brokers 9, but facial recognition 14, social media 17, advertising 34; -…
      jsrozner on HN
    • The front page mentions that the intention is to capture the public opinion. I felt that looking at the rankings didn't really meaningfully give me any useful information about a…
      readonkeyless on HN
    • The context or description shown for each "industry" is a massive injection of bias. For example, Cannabis is "Cannabis cultivation, dispensaries, and marijuana-related…
      hjkl0 on HN
  • No way to say both options are good or express nuance

    From 2 comments
    • This needs like a "both of these things are good" button.
      donatj on HN
    • The front page mentions that the intention is to capture the public opinion. I felt that looking at the rankings didn't really meaningfully give me any useful information about a…
      readonkeyless on HN
  • Small text and no progress indicator

    From 3 comments
    • Text sizes for the subtitles are very small on mobile. The thin font doesn’t help either.
      pimlottc on HN
    • worthwhile to give a sense of how many times to click in order to get through to all the categories.. like a completion bar. have a feeling that i haven't seen all but have seen…
      mli3w on HN
    • I thought this was good but then the questions never stopped, not a progress bar in sight, eventually when I clicked the ranking list, I didn’t care because it wasn’t based on my…
      adithyassekhar on HN

Requests

  • Allow intransitive preference detection or consistency checks

    From 3 comments
    • Would be cool if it ran until you had an intransitive preference. A is worse than B, which is worse than C, which is worse than A. I thought the point was to show how ranking…
      jjmarr on HN
    • yeah. I was waiting for something to get at the consistency of what I was clicking i.e. if I think A is better then B and B is better then C why do I think C is better then A.
      hackeraccount on HN
    • It just occurred to me there's an even bigger missed opportunity with the rankings. Because every "survey question" is a 1 to 1 comparison between two concepts, the most…
      hjkl0 on HN
  • Add a text input for stated positions

    From 1 comment
    • The front page mentions that the intention is to capture the public opinion. I felt that looking at the rankings didn't really meaningfully give me any useful information about a…
      readonkeyless on HN
  • Show regional or per-state breakdowns

    From 1 comment
    • Thanks, sadly it didn't pick-up on HN The diff per region/state would be fantastic! The stats are shared, nothing "per user". At first I just wanted to see if it would trigger…
      maxwellito on HN
  • Add a completion bar

    From 1 comment
    • worthwhile to give a sense of how many times to click in order to get through to all the categories.. like a completion bar. have a feeling that i haven't seen all but have seen…
      mli3w on HN

Questions

  • Does it store user data or reset each start?

    From 1 comment
    • What an interesting idea! Quick question: Do you store user data in any way or each "start" resets previous choices? What`s your plan for this? A public platform? Maybe…
      DaryaHr on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/48135764)