Photosynthesis

Not just the app idea … but the WEBSITE — is VERY WELL DONE. I immediately signed up. (And offered to help bring users to this thing.)

Impressive! And I love the comparison tool on the website. One more thing should be added as an overlay on each photo are the EXIF data, I want to see that comparison as well.

Very cool stuff, I've long thought there must be some fancy ways to get extra information for better image resolution by taking advantage of the other cameras. That said, I must…

This is interesting. I'm just curious to know how long will it survive until Apple adds something like that to their software. Do you have a fallback plan for this? But I must…

That is a fantastic name.

subscription camera app seems like peak comedy to me

How can you in good conscience charge a subscription for this? It would be one thing if the app relied on infrastructure, but it's a one and done algorithm that's entirely local…

That demo looks like Minority Report level enhancement. Amazing if it really works, but I'll be damned if I'm paying for a SaaS camera app.

This whole thing feels wrong. OP should be working for a phone manufacturer, not trying to sell this as a subscription. How much is it worth to be able to squeeze a little more…

I cannot see a meaningful difference at all in any of the example photos, so not really seeing what the point of this is.

Is it just me or do the original photos look better overall?

I am co fused, 50% of photos look better in standard zoom and 50% of them look better woth photosynthesis. This is like an anti campaign for the app hinting "in the end it…

I'm confused. So this is just producing a single photo that is clearer in a middle rectangle and blurrier outside that rectangle? Of course the extra detail in the middle is…

This appears to use a naïve masking approach (using ML to find the edges of the mask) which seems to suffer from slight uncorrected differences in lens distortion. There's a…

If it works, Apple copies it soon enough...

To be honest, I wouldn't be surprised if Apple isn't already doing this and just doesn't say so explicitly. There is a crazy amount of image processing going on behind the scenes…

I'm so confused. Does the dev not know that this is what iPhones do by default?

I like the idea of this app and the website is well done. Subscription isn't for me, but for folks who take a lot of photos and need this sort of thing, I can see it. Free tier…

Neat work, but the free tier lets you export 3 images a month and the alternative is a subscription? No thanks.

Anything like this for Android or Pixels?

Impressive! And I love the comparison tool on the website. One more thing should be added as an overlay on each photo are the EXIF data, I want to see that comparison as well.

you don't need subscription model, just one price for lifetime - that will be fair and convert better. don't do trials - do refund within 28 days

How is parallax error solved? The two cameras don't share the same optics center.

Anyone know if they’re using the native camera resolution for the zoomed part or doing sensor fusion to get better quality than either alone?

very cool app, a few questions: why does the color "temp" of the image change between traditional iphone photography vs your app? it appears to both warm and cool the images.…

I believe that's true for most/all night capture, but they take sequential frames from the same lens rather than combining multiple lenses.

I believe that's a similar idea to Apple's Deep Fusion which also takes multiple frames from the same lens then intelligently combines them for higher detail. As ipsum2 said…

Project Indigo from Adobe does that too https://apps.apple.com/us/app/project-indigo/id6742591546

Similar idea to the discontinued Light L16 camera https://petapixel.com/2017/12/08/review-light-l16-brilliant-braindead/

I believe this is something similar to what Lytro aimed to bring to market. Lytro, Inc. was an American company founded in 2006 by Ren Ng which developed some of the first…