Real-time Solar System (space.bl2.net)

Creative

space visualisation

SHOW HN2026

408points
109comments
#81of 4,366 in 2026
Top 2%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

20 positive, 26 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 6 critical, out of 53 comments about the project. Thread score +0.29.

Idea: 6 for, 2 againstDesign: 2 for, 2 againstPerformance: 3 for, 0 againstExecution: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Smooth performance with 526k asteroids

    From 3 comments
    • Brilliant project and very well done. That aside, it is just astounding that even a moderate laptop just plows through this as thought it is nothing. I remember doing orbital…
      FlowingRiver on HN
    • I love how smooth it is! Amazing work
      rtmkrptn on HN
    • 526k objects and it still feels smooth. are you culling by distance or doing something smarter on the gpu side?
      GnosiWorks on HN
  • Beautiful and informative view of satellites and asteroids

    From 3 comments
    • Beautiful site. I love how tranquil the scene becomes when satellites and spacecraft is unchecked. Thanks for that SpaceX (and others).
      karim79 on HN
    • Always wanted to see the asteroid belt's true density visualized; this really puts it into perspective. Impressive work keeping everything performant.
      dunlin on HN
    • I love this; also runs surprisingly smoothly (at least in browser; didn't check mobile). Also beautiful and hypnotic in motion. What's the next step that you want to take to…
      blindflag on HN

Objections

  • Satellites and objects are not drawn to scale

    From 3 comments
    • > It's a browser view of the Solar System at real scale Is it really? I don't think you could see the satellites, if they weren't drawn at 1000x scale. I am wrong? At real scale,…
      ____tom____ on HN
    • I think it's pretty obvious the satellites aren't drawn to scale, given they don't change in size when zooming in/out.
      jsphweid on HN
    • Good point, the page now says it: distances are to scale, the dots are not.
      wanick on HN
  • Missing some asteroids

    From 2 comments
    • This asteroid is missing FWIW https://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/tools/sbdb_lookup.html#/?sstr=20031689
      sebmellen on HN
    • Oh man, it seems like my asteroid (Minor Planet 31689 - Sebmellen [0]) is missing. [0]: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6711174 [1]:…
      sebmellen on HN
  • Hard to select or center on a planet

    From 1 comment

Requests

  • Faster zoom and mobile zoom support

    From 2 comments
    • A way to zoom that is faster than mouse wheel would be nice. Takes forever to zoom out a long way!
      boxed on HN
    • Being able to zoom on mobile at all would be great. And a way to close all of the overlay panels!
      Oarch on HN
  • Filter asteroids by approach to a target body

    From 1 comment
    • I would love to filter for asteroids that have orbits that bring them into within a certain range of a target body like earth.
      fouc on HN
  • Keyboard pause and a Now button

    From 1 comment
    • Fun: 116 d/s with Earth/etc selected, gives a Sun "orbiting" the Earth/etc effect. Bug: ISO DEB at 17 min/s looked normal, but at 2.8 h/s it became a solid-ish (lots of crossing…
      mncharity on HN
  • Source code on GitHub

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • How are spacecraft positions sourced from JPL

    From 1 comment
    • How are you sourcing the spacecraft positions from JPL? Are you just grabbing a huge list of state vectors? My old day job was to compute asteroid positions for NASA telescopes,…
      ddahlen on HN
  • How are satellites shown when launched dates are in the future or past

    From 1 comment
    • ``` >satellites appear and disappear by launch date ``` This uses the modern TLE propagated backwards in time (vs using historical TLEs), correct?
      schiffern on HN
  • What share of tracked satellites is Starlink

    From 2 comments
    • Almost 1 in 3 tracked spacecraft is Starlink, is that accurate?
      1shooner on HN
    • Even more than that. Of the 35k tracked "Satellites and spacecraft", more than 12k are debris bringing Starlink to 1 in 2. If you look only at Active known satellites, around 2…
      Sayrus on HN

Alternatives named

  • Celestia

    From 2 comments
    • Celestia did all of this and more. 10+ years ago. https://celestiaproject.space/
      tintor on HN
    • > and the download page looks like this: https://sourceforge.net/projects/celestia/ The page that states "Please do not download Celestia from this repository. This repository…
      defrost on HN
  • Stellarium

    From 1 comment
    • > and the download page looks like this: https://sourceforge.net/projects/celestia/ The page that states "Please do not download Celestia from this repository. This repository…
      defrost on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/49898778)