Llmspeed

AI

local llm benchmarking

SHOW HN2026

Legend

Llmspeed

feel how fast a local LLM runs before you buy the hardware

llmspeed.dev

#local llm#gpu benchmark#tokens per second#llm hardware

331points
86comments
#113of 4,366 in 2026
Top 3%of 2026 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

5 positive, 28 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 15 critical, out of 50 comments about the project. Thread score -0.20.

Performance: 3 for, 11 againstExecution: 0 for, 2 againstIdea: 1 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful for judging whether expensive hardware makes a difference

    From 2 comments
    • This is great. It solves two of my issues: ``` 1. It is difficult to figure out if dropping $10k+ on hardware will make a meaningful difference for running local models. 2.…
      tom_alexander on HN
    • I don't know what basis these numbers are estimated on, but my M2 Ultra 128GB runs almost twice as fast as what's reported for the M3 Ultra 512GB. I wished there was such a tool…
      pil0u on HN
  • Good idea and well designed

    From 2 comments
    • It would be cool if I could just search for a GPU instead of scrolling through the whole list. Overall, great website!
      riobits on HN
    • Cool examples, this is interesting to test. I've noticed that OpenAI and Meta play a lot with animations and fades to mask the delays.
      kinduff on HN

Objections

  • Speed estimates are off compared with real setups

    From 4 comments
    • It says 46 tok/sec for Qwen3.6-27b 4 bit on RTX5090, but I get 60-70 tok/sec on a small context like that (5 bit weights with 8 bit KV cache), although it does slow down to 40…
      kgeist on HN
    • A random number I checked feels kinda optimistic, or there's something wrong with my setup; Gemma 26B-A4B on a 16GB 5060Ti is reported to get 21-88tok/s with Q4_K_M, meanwhile I…
      adrian17 on HN
    • Just chiming in that the idea is cool, but the speeds are way wrong
      lisplist on HN
    • I don't know what basis these numbers are estimated on, but my M2 Ultra 128GB runs almost twice as fast as what's reported for the M3 Ultra 512GB. I wished there was such a tool…
      pil0u on HN
  • Ignores llama.cpp tuning, speculative decoding and context size

    From 2 comments
    • It says 46 tok/sec for Qwen3.6-27b 4 bit on RTX5090, but I get 60-70 tok/sec on a small context like that (5 bit weights with 8 bit KV cache), although it does slow down to 40…
      kgeist on HN
    • It would be great if numbers weren't off, would include optimised versions (ie. speculative decoding), context size, include allowed parallel inference (single agents use…
      mirekrusin on HN
  • Model and quant choices are limited and default to tiny quants

    From 2 comments
    • This tool has very tiny quants available for each model, and defaults to the tiny quants, so I'm not so sure you... tried it?
      layla5alive on HN
    • Model list is a bit limited, and whole harness affects the speed, so the libs used in harness and their versions might be useful to show for each individual model setup.
      bozdemir on HN

Requests

  • Multi-GPU configurations

    From 3 comments
    • I would like to see in such simulators: - multi GPU configuration (hetero and homo) - PCIe gen chooser (3.0/4.0/5.0) - is nvlink enabled (2 cards, 2 x 2 cards, 3 x 2 cards) - is…
      gitowiec on HN
    • Please modify to include multiples of each as well. Most serious people aren't going to use a single PCIe card if they can help it.
      sleight42 on HN
    • Doesn't provide for hybrid setups RTX5070 + RTX5080 for example.
      Perenti on HN
  • Add harness details to results

    From 1 comment
    • I’ll look into adding harnesses. The benchmark sources usually don’t contain harness so the problem is limited data. What models would you like to see?
      albinstman on HN
  • More models and hardware such as DGX Spark laptops

    From 2 comments
    • A ton of RTX Spark (supposedly similar to DGX Spark) laptops just came out. We really need this for those. Asus ProArt P14, Surface Ultra, Yoga Pro 9n, etc. I am hoping the…
      ilaksh on HN
    • Missing: Dual Strix Halo, Dual Nvidia Spark
      Tepix on HN

Questions

  • How accurate are the simulations?

    From 1 comment
  • How does it handle context length and prefill?

    From 2 comments
    • How about context length? Isn't it still just a few thousand tokens on local models?
      Geee on HN
    • This is a great idea but I'm far less concerned about output token speed and way more about the ability to parallelize prefill - for agentic coding that's pretty much way more…
      friendly_chap on HN

Alternatives named

  • Sparkbench for platform-specific leaderboards

    From 1 comment
    • There are also platform specific sites which have leaderboards for different models and setups. Having an OEM Spark, this one has been very helpful https://sparkbench.dev/
      verdverm on HN
  • Renting GPUs on vast.ai to test hardware

    From 2 comments
    • just go rent one for a few minutes and try it out ... it'll cost you well under $0.50 if you're just trying to get a feel for if it's right for you. There's a lot of things like…
      kristopolous on HN
    • Depending on what hardware you're considering, you might rent a vast.ai box with similar specs for a month or two to get a feel for it.
      montroser on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/50127979)