Cloud 66

Infrastructure

deployment management

SHOW HN2013

207points
108comments
#67of 1,739 in 2013
Top 4%of 2013 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

16 positive, 38 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 8 critical, out of 62 comments about the project. Thread score +0.11.

Idea: 6 for, 4 againstDesign: 3 for, 1 againstPricing: 1 for, 2 againstExecution: 2 for, 0 againstPerformance: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Fills a real need for managed infrastructure with Heroku-like ease

    From 2 comments
    • I think this targets a real painful need, managing an EC2 app on your own is not lacking frustrations, simple things like creating a rolling backup of instances needs complex…
      eranation on HN
    • This is an awesome idea. I've been looking for something with the flexibility of managed infrastructure but the ease of use of Heroku for a while. I'll definitely be trying it out.
      lucisferre on HN
  • Keeps full root access to your own servers

    From 2 comments
    • I have used this since it's been in beta because I know the guys behind the service. Besides being exceptionally dedicated and cool guys, the service is genuinely good. It…
      MathieuLoutre on HN
    • 1. We support manifest files (in private beta now) to allow you just that. 2. Yes. Both on the server (as you would do normally on any linux box) and through our CRON app. 3. We…
      ksajadi on HN
  • Clean, slick UI

    From 1 comment
    • Great job, the UI looks really slick, Ubuntu is working on something similar (deploying development stacks to any cloud):…
      jcastro on HN

Objections

  • Only supports Rails for now

    From 2 comments
    • Heroku does more than rails apps. This seems to only do rails?
      emperorcezar on HN
    • for a still fairly new to intermediate developer like myself, this seems more work than running it on heroku. not a bad concept, but maybe for more advanced developers.
      oprules on HN
  • Pricing seems too low for the value provided

    From 1 comment
    • At $9/month I suspect you are drastically under-valuing the service you provide. Sysadmin time is expensive, and your value proposition is the same as Heroku: pay us so you don't…
      _phred on HN
  • Unclear company backing and long-term viability

    From 1 comment
    • At $9/month I suspect you are drastically under-valuing the service you provide. Sysadmin time is expensive, and your value proposition is the same as Heroku: pay us so you don't…
      _phred on HN
  • Seems more complex than Heroku for less experienced developers

    From 1 comment
    • for a still fairly new to intermediate developer like myself, this seems more work than running it on heroku. not a bad concept, but maybe for more advanced developers.
      oprules on HN

Requests

  • Node.js support

    From 2 comments
    • No mention of what size instances are being created on aws seems a bit scary. Otherwise cool. I'd use it if it were self hosted and available for node.
      slajax on HN
    • Thanks for your question. 1. node.js support is coming soon! 2. We're going to have at least one self-hosted real-time push solution in our app store (think Socket.io or Faye).…
      ksajadi on HN
  • Python/Django support

    From 2 comments
    • Any love for python/django? Or maybe will wok on top of the heroku buildpacks?
      mamcx on HN
    • This, but Python hosting.
      Beltiras on HN
  • Redis support

    From 1 comment
    • Do you have a better pricing page somewhere? $9 per server per month... what kind of server? Micro instance? Also, is there any Redis support?
      instakill on HN
  • Unicorn support

    From 1 comment
    • Any plans to support nginx/unicorn? Love passenger, but I really need the rolling restarts...
      oldgregg on HN
  • Digital Ocean support

    From 1 comment
    • This is awesome! I see there's Linode support built in - any plans to do the same with Digital Ocean?
      rjsamson on HN

Questions

  • How does the deployment work technically

    From 1 comment
    • Can you give a technical explanation of how this actually works? Heroku works by compiling your git repository with a buildpack into a "slug" and then booting that slug on a…
      themgt on HN
  • How it differs from Elastic Beanstalk

    From 1 comment
    • doesn't amazon elastic beanstalk solve the "heroku-ish deploy on EC2" problem?
      riffraff on HN
  • How security updates are handled

    From 1 comment
    • What about server security updates? How do you handle normal package updates, restarting services after an update, etc?
      adamonduty on HN
  • What security measures are in place

    From 1 comment

Alternatives named

  • Elastic Beanstalk

    From 1 comment
    • doesn't amazon elastic beanstalk solve the "heroku-ish deploy on EC2" problem?
      riffraff on HN
  • Heroku

    From 1 comment
  • CloudFoundry

    From 1 comment
    • How is this different from CloudFoundry? Which does this for more than rails apps?
      Vekz on HN
  • OpenShift Origin

    From 1 comment
  • Juju

    From 1 comment
    • This is a neat solution for a reality those of us who have been building web applications for a decade have faced: If you want your application experience (code + infrastructure)…
      j45 on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/5213862)