Faith in Humanity

AI

sentiment analysis

SHOW HN2013

49points
24comments
#511of 1,739 in 2013
Top 30%of 2013 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

1 positive, 5 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 11 critical, out of 19 comments about the project. Thread score -0.45.

Performance: 0 for, 6 againstIdea: 0 for, 3 againstDesign: 1 for, 1 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Cool little weekend hack with a nice UI

    From 1 comment
    • Cool little weekend hack. Love the UI. It's a refreshing take on sentiment analysis.
      jimmybook on HN

Objections

  • Sentiment analysis misclassifies many tweets, including negated phrases

    From 4 comments
    • Pretty neat, though it looks like the sentiment analysis could use some work. There are quite a lot of negative ones on the positive side. EDIT: Might be useful to expand this…
      jstanley on HN
    • I see some positive ones on the negative side too: "Batman no!! You can't lose your faith in humanity!" "You must not lose faith in humanity. [...] - Gandhi" I don't know how the…
      ScottBurson on HN
    • They'll be cancelled out by false positives, eg 'I try to maintain my my faith in humanity. Sometimes I succeed.'
      anigbrowl on HN
    • Some are misclassified, such as "before I lose faith", or "else I will lost faith"
      xijuan on HN
  • Measuring humanity via Twitter is not representative

    From 2 comments
    • I can't help but lose a little faith in humanity when I see that faith in humanity is measured via Twitter.
      joshrotenberg on HN
    • Twitter is not the world or a meaningful representation of the world.
      RyanIyengar on HN

Requests

  • Allow users to enter their own search terms

    From 2 comments
    • Pretty neat, though it looks like the sentiment analysis could use some work. There are quite a lot of negative ones on the positive side. EDIT: Might be useful to expand this…
      jstanley on HN
    • Hi! Creator here, yes the sentiment analysis could definitely use more work but we've found our naiive approach to be about 95% accurate which was good enough for our MVP.…
      imkevinxu on HN
  • Let users correct sentiment labels to improve the algorithm

    From 1 comment
    • Or allow page viewers to move something from one column to the other and have the back-end receive notification so that it modifies its sentiment algorithm automagically.
      locopati on HN

Questions

  • What is the naive approach used for classification?

    From 1 comment
    • Might I ask what exactly is the naive approach? Is it simply searching for keywords like "lose", "lost", etc?
      fatjokes on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/5395535)