Imgix.js

Infrastructure

image processing service client

SHOW HN2014

102points
32comments
#268of 2,272 in 2014
Top 12%of 2014 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

3 positive, 5 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 5 critical, out of 14 comments about the project. Thread score -0.26.

Pricing: 1 for, 1 againstIdea: 1 for, 1 againstDesign: 0 for, 2 againstExecution: 1 for, 0 againstDocs: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Simple total cost of ownership versus building your own image server

    From 1 comment
    • It's about total cost of ownership A: Imgix = cost of imgix subscription + integration time * hourly rate (it's dead simple) B: Rolling your own = dev time * hourly rate +…
      nc on HN
  • imgix's API is intuitive and fast

    From 1 comment
    • I can't speak specifically about this responsive image feature, but as for imgix's core business, I have mixed feelings. It's pretty trivial to write on-the-fly image processing…
      latch on HN

Objections

  • Does not output a valid img tag without JavaScript

    From 2 comments
    • This is nice, but it does not put a valid img tag in the document source without javascript execution. That might be fine for things that don't face the public internet, but if…
      justinph on HN
    • Why isn't there an img-tag in the default example? Why are you promoting bad practice by not having images in img-tags? You solved one problem but created a much bigger problem.…
      sleepyhead on HN
  • Concern about dependence on a paid service with uncertain future

    From 1 comment
    • I wonder why are there so many services that work with this kind of business model. while I would be willing to pay for code I can own, I would never invest in something in…
      fimdomeio on HN

Requests

  • Use standard picture and srcset markup instead

    From 2 comments
    • What would the advantage of this be versus using the picture tag with your own image sources hosted on a CDN? (Let's assume picture tag is widely supported for now)
      kingzain on HN
    • Yes it is 2014 and we should be able to follow simple standards that has been around for quite some time.
      sleepyhead on HN

Questions

  • What is the imgix stack and how is image processing built

    From 2 comments
    • Did you run across the memory leak issue too? Could you talk about the imgix stack? I'm curious to know what it is like.
      egonschiele on HN
    • I just had to write an image server for work and found it incredibly hard. What's your on-the-fly image processing setup look like?
      egonschiele on HN

Alternatives named

  • Thumbor

    From 1 comment
    • There are at least couple open source projects that handle dynamic image generation on the backend quite nicely. It seems photon is dead, but I found it works quite well and is…
      michaelmior on HN
  • Photon

    From 1 comment
    • There are at least couple open source projects that handle dynamic image generation on the backend quite nicely. It seems photon is dead, but I found it works quite well and is…
      michaelmior on HN
  • ImageMagick and GraphicsMagick

    From 2 comments
    • I'd break it down into two parts. The first is the image transformation. For this we use graphics magic, and based on the params in the querystring, we'd crop, resize, alter the…
      latch on HN
    • I worked for a company that used ImageMagick for compositing images together and resizing them to one of ~60 sizes (different page locations, device types, etc.). While it…
      skuhn on HN
  • Picturefill with picture and srcset

    From 1 comment
    • There is nothing stopping you from setting the src tag. But you are just adding another request. Our base service works perfectly with src set and picturefill. This library is…
      miggi on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/8435604)