VirtKick

Infrastructure

self-hosted vm management

SHOW HN2014

216points
92comments
#87of 2,272 in 2014
Top 4%of 2014 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

10 positive, 20 neutral or asking, 3 mixed, 15 critical, out of 48 comments about the project. Thread score -0.17.

Idea: 4 for, 6 againstExecution: 0 for, 3 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • AGPL licence choice welcomed

    From 2 comments
    • This is an awesome project! Thanks for choosing the AGPLv3! I tried to create a VM on the demo site, and got a nice Ruby error message next to the VM's name on the 'Machines'…
      davexunit on HN
    • Virtkick has a web application component, which makes the AGPL a great choice. Without the 'Affero' component, anyone could host a version of VirtKick with proprietary…
      davexunit on HN
  • Simple UI and clear goal

    From 2 comments
    • So excited to see this! Great job guys!
      dailen on HN
    • I've been following this for a while, and it looks like an awesome way to roll your own cloud!
      jameshk on HN

Objections

  • Copyright assignment requirement raises worries about proprietary relicensing

    From 3 comments
    • This looks cool, but I can't see why contributors should assign you copyright so you can sell proprietary versions of VirtKick. Very few free software projects have copyright…
      eltondegeneres on HN
    • This is an awesome project! Thanks for choosing the AGPLv3! I tried to create a VM on the demo site, and got a nice Ruby error message next to the VM's name on the 'Machines'…
      davexunit on HN
    • With a copyright assignment, the authors could take the entire project closed-source for future versions. You'd still be able to use older, AGPL-licensed versions, but perhaps…
      mbreese on HN
  • Not truly self-hosted DigitalOcean, and libvirt tools already exist

    From 3 comments
    • I would not consider nor call this "Self-hosted DigitalOcean" - Interesting project never the less.
      neom on HN
    • Without any judgement over the project and its quality, I would not call it "Self-hosted DO". Because DigitalOcean, basically, is a way to get VMs without self-hosting them!
      hbbio on HN
    • So what exactly is the advantage of using this layer over the existing libvirt ecosystem? If this is supposed to manage your VMs for you instead of you using the existing libvirt…
      catern on HN

Requests

  • SSH key injection for VMs

    From 2 comments
    • I actually wanted to create something like this. Does it do ssh key injection when VMS are created?
      Stephen304 on HN
    • Perfect! I wanted to host my own DO type thing for personal projects and I tried "webvirtmgr" which has a nice control panel for libvirt, but the creator insists that ssh key…
      Stephen304 on HN
  • Support for more Linux distributions

    From 1 comment
    • This is an awesome project! Thanks for choosing the AGPLv3! I tried to create a VM on the demo site, and got a nice Ruby error message next to the VM's name on the 'Machines'…
      davexunit on HN
  • LXC support

    From 1 comment

Questions

  • Why libvirt and not existing tools or OpenStack

    From 2 comments
    • So what exactly is the advantage of using this layer over the existing libvirt ecosystem? If this is supposed to manage your VMs for you instead of you using the existing libvirt…
      catern on HN
    • So what is this? A project based off of openstack, a complete re-working of an openstack-like environment or something different?
      salesforce_wha on HN
  • Is documentation available

    From 1 comment

Alternatives named

  • OpenStack

    From 2 comments
    • I disagree - OpenStack scales down perfectly to two-machine or even (one-machine) deployments (if you don't want HA). It is a pain to configure, but that's the price you pay for…
      q3k on HN
    • A complete re-working - as OpenStack is too big if you're not a corporation with a very big infrastructure.
      Nowaker on HN
  • WebVirtMgr

    From 1 comment
    • You may be surprised that VirtKick wraps WebVirtMgr and uses it as a JSON API for libvirt. :-) This is a temporary solution but does the job - it allowed us to start real quick…
      Nowaker on HN
  • Cloud Foundry

    From 1 comment

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/8527185)