PencilCase

Dev tools

app builder

SHOW HN2015

52points
29comments
#547of 2,565 in 2015
Top 22%of 2015 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

5 positive, 10 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 6 critical, out of 21 comments about the project. Thread score -0.01.

Pricing: 2 for, 5 againstIdea: 2 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Interesting concept and solid implementation

    From 2 comments
    • To offer a counterpoint to fit2rule's comment, I'm probably smack in the middle of your target demo (currently employed as a business analyst, technically competent but not a…
      brianlash on HN
    • This is an interesting concept. But I can't help but think it looks like it's focused on UI design interaction, and not necessarily full app design. What provisions are in place…
      ssewell on HN
  • Subscription pricing is fair for business use

    From 2 comments
    • To offer a counterpoint to fit2rule's comment, I'm probably smack in the middle of your target demo (currently employed as a business analyst, technically competent but not a…
      brianlash on HN
    • Not arguing with fit2rule--he/she can buy what he/she chooses--but I think a subscription model is Just Fine. If I'm making money or even pursuing a hobby, $300/yr is completely…
      midnightmonster on HN

Objections

  • Subscription pricing is a major turnoff versus a one-time purchase

    From 4 comments
    • Can you justify the subscription model? To me this is a major turnoff.
      fit2rule on HN
    • I'd like to buy it once for a fixed price, use the heck out of it, and purchase an upgrade offered to me as a loyal customer, when it happens, if I want to. Milking money out of…
      fit2rule on HN
    • I'd rather have a fixed cost than a continuing cost. Why is it better to be paying for a tool every month rather than to own the tool, outright? I'm not seeing the argument for…
      fit2rule on HN
    • My feedback: your subscription model has completely soured me to your product. I get that you have your reasons for choosing the economic position to support your own continued…
      fit2rule on HN
  • Focus may be UI design rather than full app design

    From 1 comment
    • This is an interesting concept. But I can't help but think it looks like it's focused on UI design interaction, and not necessarily full app design. What provisions are in place…
      ssewell on HN
  • Possible App Store policy conflict with downloading and running JavaScript

    From 2 comments
    • Question for the developers: It looks like the iOS app allows you to download apps built with the desktop tool, which supports evaluation of Javascript snippets. Isn't this…
      buza on HN
    • The difference I'm specifically curious about is the issue about 'downloading' arbitrary code and evaluating it. Current app offerings don't have this support because Apple has…
      buza on HN

Requests

  • Offer a cheaper monthly option or a one-time purchase

    From 3 comments
    • The advantage of subscription is that everyone is always running the latest and greatest. Typically software will instead charge for major version releases in the future which…
      crayment on HN
    • Not arguing with fit2rule--he/she can buy what he/she chooses--but I think a subscription model is Just Fine. If I'm making money or even pursuing a hobby, $300/yr is completely…
      midnightmonster on HN
    • I'd like to buy it once for a fixed price, use the heck out of it, and purchase an upgrade offered to me as a loyal customer, when it happens, if I want to. Milking money out of…
      fit2rule on HN
  • Expose persistent storage, push notifications and external APIs to non-developers

    From 2 comments
    • This is an interesting concept. But I can't help but think it looks like it's focused on UI design interaction, and not necessarily full app design. What provisions are in place…
      ssewell on HN
    • Our goal is definitely to allow full app design. Currently we unlock most of these more powerful features by allowing you to write JavaScript. For example we expose a key value…
      crayment on HN

Questions

  • Does it allow access to native APIs?

    From 2 comments
    • This looks great! Does it allow access to the native APIs?
      sbashyal on HN
    • Devs here. We use JavaScriptCore to expose native Objective-C APIs. This gives you access to any API we expose right in PencilCase: Studio. To go beyond that we allow exporting…
      crayment on HN
  • Is JavaScript execution allowed under App Store policy?

    From 3 comments
    • Question for the developers: It looks like the iOS app allows you to download apps built with the desktop tool, which supports evaluation of Javascript snippets. Isn't this…
      buza on HN
    • Hi, one of the devs here! You're correct, PencilCase: Player can evaluate JavaScript using the JavaScriptCore framework included on the device. The App Store already has a lot of…
      interstateone on HN
    • Yeah, App Store guidelines can be ambiguous, and JavaScriptCore becoming a public framework could be seen as an endorsement of this type of functionality, but we don't have any…
      interstateone on HN

Alternatives named

  • Neonto Studio

    From 1 comment
    • Another tool for designing native iOS apps is Neonto Studio. It supports Android too: http://neonto.com Neonto's generated code is "runtime-free" -- there's no framework or other…
      pavlov on HN
  • Flash Studio

    From 2 comments
    • like flash studio right?
      jlebrech on HN
    • I think that's a valid comparison. If Flash Studio was designed today for mobile with some inspiration from HyperCard (specifically how it allowed non developers to build great…
      crayment on HN
  • Xcode

    From 1 comment

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/9270096)