Blockads

Security and privacy

ad blocking

SHOW HN2016

92points
139comments
#414of 2,264 in 2016
Top 19%of 2016 by points

How HN took it

DebatedReal support and real criticism

22 positive, 19 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 18 critical, out of 61 comments about the project. Thread score -0.04.

Idea: 11 for, 8 againstPrivacy: 7 for, 1 againstExecution: 0 for, 6 againstPerformance: 2 for, 1 againstDesign: 2 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

Objections

  • Ad blocking harms the revenue that funds free websites

    From 3 comments
    • I don't get it. A big part of the web is paid by ads. Lots of websites rely on (non-invasive) ads to sustain themselves and provide content to anyone for free. It's safe to say…
      agopaul on HN
    • Ads pay for some web sites. People pay for ads because they want the attention of the sites' readers to get them to buy their products. People buy their products, which pays for…
      morsch on HN
    • I've never seen a group so ready and willing to destroy their chances at future success. Ads are pretty much the only way to make a living when you are bootstrapping. These…
      bobby_9x on HN
  • Blocker detection misses host-file and other blocking methods

    From 4 comments
    • I'm using Dan Pollock's hosts file method[1] which is detected by Wired and Forbes, but not this site. [1]: http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
      accommodavid on HN
    • Checked Firefox and Chrome, with uMatrix in a typical configuration that blocks all but first-party requests and external images and CSS by default and a default set of common AD…
      drdaeman on HN
    • I visited the site from an iOS device with Purify installed and enabled for 'Ads and Tracking'. The site told me It didn't detect an ad blocker.
      rahimnathwani on HN
    • Doesn't appear to detect the use of Privacy Badger on Firefox.
      psynapse on HN
  • Ad blocking is a misnomer; the real concern is tracking and malware

    From 2 comments
    • Ad blocking is a rhetorical misnomer. It's not ad blocking, it's malware blocking. I have no problem with ads and would allow to be subjected to them if cookies, trackers,…
      SCAQTony on HN
    • It's mostly about tracking for me.
      Touche on HN

Requests

  • Detect more blocking methods such as host files and other blockers

    From 3 comments
    • I'm using Dan Pollock's hosts file method[1] which is detected by Wired and Forbes, but not this site. [1]: http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/
      accommodavid on HN
    • Checked Firefox and Chrome, with uMatrix in a typical configuration that blocks all but first-party requests and external images and CSS by default and a default set of common AD…
      drdaeman on HN
    • I visited the site from an iOS device with Purify installed and enabled for 'Ads and Tracking'. The site told me It didn't detect an ad blocker.
      rahimnathwani on HN
  • Link to the right extension for the user's browser instead of uBlock Origin on GitHub

    From 1 comment
    • I visited it on Firefox mobile and it correctly detected that I didn't have adblock (as I tend to only read HN and technical blogs on my phone), but the link send me to uBlock…
      Coding_Cat on HN
  • Support Ghostery and Privacy Badger detection

    From 2 comments
    • I'm simply using Ghostery to block any ad trackers and other scripts. Which this site tells me it's apparently not enough.
      ricardolopes on HN
    • Doesn't appear to detect the use of Privacy Badger on Firefox.
      psynapse on HN

Questions

  • Why should people block ads when ads fund the web?

    From 2 comments
    • The "Why?" text didn't convince me at all, so... why? I'm serious. I don't mind ads and I don't mind being tracked. On the contrary I've found interesting products on banners,…
      Kiro on HN
    • I don't get it. A big part of the web is paid by ads. Lots of websites rely on (non-invasive) ads to sustain themselves and provide content to anyone for free. It's safe to say…
      agopaul on HN

Alternatives named

  • uBlock Origin

    From 2 comments
    • I visited it on Firefox mobile and it correctly detected that I didn't have adblock (as I tend to only read HN and technical blogs on my phone), but the link send me to uBlock…
      Coding_Cat on HN
    • Hmm. I'm conflicted. I am very much against tracking, and ads that track retarget and abuse me, so am very restrictive in terms of what I let near my browser. I'd also be very…
      anexprogrammer on HN
  • Adblock Plus

    From 2 comments
    • Hmmm, are you by any chance using a filter list other than Easy List in adblockplus?
      k1m on HN
    • To be honest, I think when it comes to usability, most users of ad blockers aren't going to change settings. And having just checked it against Adblock Plus, I'm not so convinced…
      k1m on HN
  • Privacy Badger

    From 1 comment
    • One thing about this, is that I don't particularly want an ad-blocker per se: I want a malicious-or-annoying-stuff blocker. So I primarily use Privacy Badger, which dynamically…
      andrewaylett on HN
  • Ghostery

    From 1 comment
    • I'm simply using Ghostery to block any ad trackers and other scripts. Which this site tells me it's apparently not enough.
      ricardolopes on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/11222499)