Cliapp.store

Web and SaaS

app store marketplace

SHOW HN2018

19points
38comments
#1,225of 2,155 in 2018
Top 57%of 2018 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

0 positive, 7 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 16 critical, out of 24 comments about the project. Thread score -0.65.

Idea: 0 for, 8 againstPricing: 0 for, 6 againstDocs: 0 for, 2 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Idea of letting open source CLI authors monetise their work is appreciated

    From 2 comments
    • I appreciate the idea of allowing utility CLI programs to be monetised by their authors. But it does look at the moment like the site is charging for git, pandoc, etc. Is any of…
      sago on HN
    • I really like the root need of this, paying for open source, but I think the execution is significantly off. It might be nice to see an open source foundation create something…
      joshka on HN

Objections

  • Sells free open source apps without authors' consent or knowledge

    From 3 comments
    • Most of the programs that you're publishing on your "app store" have independent monetization channels, including direct donations from their users via accounts that they…
      woodruffw on HN
    • The most important question for me looking at projects like git, httpie and youtube-dl being sold for 2,99€... Have they actually been submitted by their respective owner? If so…
      WhatsName on HN
    • I'm the Homebrew lead maintainer and I can publicly confirm you have not had any contact with our project to discuss monetisation.
      mikemcquaid on HN
  • Pricing info is misleading; claims apps need a license though they are free

    From 3 comments
    • They are openly lying about the terms. Click the "trial license" (what?) text on any of the shop pages and read > You can try out Pandoc for free. To use it regularly, you must…
      detaro on HN
    • This is terrible. The pricing info page is completely misleading, and written in a way that obscures the fact that all of this software is available completely for free.
      9935c101ab17a66 on HN
    • "You can try out Git for free. To use it regularly, you must buy a license." Which license does this notice message refer to? This is completely wrong!
      daw___ on HN
  • Money pooled before reaching authors; donating directly is simpler

    From 2 comments
    • Pandoc is not a commercial product. By claiming one must buy a license, you are misrepresenting its actual license. If you're actually selling your own wrapper around it, make…
      detaro on HN
    • Why should I pay you, whom will inevitably take a cut on top of the payment processing cut, when I can donate to the developer directly where only the payment processing cut…
      Operyl on HN
  • Existing package managers like Homebrew already offer these apps free

    From 2 comments
    • All of these applications and a whole lot more are available in Homebrew as well. Which can be kept upgraded with Topgrade [1] [1] https://github.com/r-darwish/topgrade
      Fnoord on HN
    • This is really shady and I don't see advantages over a conventional package manager
      Jack5500 on HN

Requests

  • Partner with package managers like Homebrew instead of a separate store

    From 1 comment
    • As a suggestion, perhaps it would be better to start talking with homebrew for this instead, and generally bolting on top of existing package managers rather than adding another…
      joshka on HN
  • Get explicit consent from project maintainers before listing

    From 1 comment
    • Most of the programs that you're publishing on your "app store" have independent monetization channels, including direct donations from their users via accounts that they…
      woodruffw on HN

Questions

  • Is it legal to charge for open source tools not owned by the site?

    From 1 comment
    • Can anyone explain to me in layman terms, how this is legal? I mean charging money for freely available open source tools, not owned by this site?
      rhardih on HN
  • Are the apps' authors actually receiving the money?

    From 2 comments
    • I appreciate the idea of allowing utility CLI programs to be monetised by their authors. But it does look at the moment like the site is charging for git, pandoc, etc. Is any of…
      sago on HN
    • The most important question for me looking at projects like git, httpie and youtube-dl being sold for 2,99€... Have they actually been submitted by their respective owner? If so…
      WhatsName on HN

Alternatives named

  • Homebrew

    From 2 comments
    • All of these applications and a whole lot more are available in Homebrew as well. Which can be kept upgraded with Topgrade [1] [1] https://github.com/r-darwish/topgrade
      Fnoord on HN
    • So this is literally monetisation [1] based on the work of Homebrew [2]? [1] https://github.com/feramhq/cli-apps/blob/master/git/main.yaml#L23 [2]…
      RayDonnelly on HN
  • awesome-cli-apps list

    From 1 comment
  • Topgrade for upgrading packages

    From 1 comment
    • All of these applications and a whole lot more are available in Homebrew as well. Which can be kept upgraded with Topgrade [1] [1] https://github.com/r-darwish/topgrade
      Fnoord on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/18107198)