TLDR This

Productivity

article summarizer

SHOW HN2020

118points
59comments
#550of 3,028 in 2020
Top 19%of 2020 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

5 positive, 11 neutral or asking, 4 mixed, 16 critical, out of 36 comments about the project. Thread score -0.26.

Execution: 1 for, 13 againstIdea: 0 for, 2 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 againstPerformance: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Summaries work well on some articles, including Dutch and Finnish

    From 2 comments
    • Awesome product! I was quite surprised at how good it summarized Dutch articles as well. Are you planning to launch an API anytime soon?
      RubenvanE on HN
    • This thing understands Finnish? Very strange. TLDR from this was quite excellent: https://sarastuslehti.com/2020/03/12/koronaviruksen-kayra-on-murskattava/
      timonoko on HN
  • Quick and useful for some articles

    From 2 comments

Objections

  • Summaries are basic and miss key points on many articles

    From 3 comments
    • I really want to like this. My points - 1. From the articles I tried, the summaries seem to be very basic. They don't seem to capture the essential points of the articles it is…
      thunderbong on HN
    • I did try to run it four times, and in each case the result was semi-random: it looks like picking 4 random sentences that open paragraphs. There was not a single case when I…
      stared on HN
    • I love the idea. The implementation did not produce the expected results ( article shown on HN -…
      A4ET8a8uTh0 on HN
  • Performs poorly on technical and long articles

    From 3 comments
    • While I didn't have high hopes to get a summary of a technical paper, since I spend a good chunk of time every week reading some related to exploits and mitigations for a podcast…
      kdbg on HN
    • I tried this on three of my own articles. It worked very poorly. There’s a lot of room for improvement before asking people to pay for it IMO. I may try my hand at writing one…
      elliotec on HN
    • https://p.migdal.pl/2020/03/02/types-tests-typescript.html https://p.migdal.pl/2017/07/23/dating-for-nerds.html…
      stared on HN
  • Basic and advanced summaries often look the same or the advanced is still weak

    From 2 comments
    • While I didn't have high hopes to get a summary of a technical paper, since I spend a good chunk of time every week reading some related to exploits and mitigations for a podcast…
      kdbg on HN
    • If the Basic Summarizer is meant to convince me to sign up for the Advanced Summarizer, that's not gonna happen with the former providing unconvincing results.
      jstummbillig on HN
  • Summarization may spread misinformation and reduce understanding

    From 1 comment
    • Is there any thought put into considering if this type of service is actually beneficial? Of course on it's face it seems nice that it saves us time. But it's no secret that the…
      txcwpalpha on HN

Requests

  • Launch an API

    From 2 comments
    • Awesome product! I was quite surprised at how good it summarized Dutch articles as well. Are you planning to launch an API anytime soon?
      RubenvanE on HN
    • While I didn't have high hopes to get a summary of a technical paper, since I spend a good chunk of time every week reading some related to exploits and mitigations for a podcast…
      kdbg on HN
  • Better results on technical content

    From 1 comment
    • https://p.migdal.pl/2020/03/02/types-tests-typescript.html https://p.migdal.pl/2017/07/23/dating-for-nerds.html…
      stared on HN

Questions

  • How does the summarizer work?

    From 1 comment
  • Is there a paying customer base?

    From 1 comment
    • Interesting stuff. Have you succeeded in getting paying customers for such a service? I've seen some similar free alternatives online, i.e. resoomer, smmry
      personjerry on HN

Alternatives named

  • SMMRY

    From 2 comments
    • I first heard about this from the autotldr bot on Reddit [1] which uses a similar service SMMRY [2]. The SMMRY page points out some extra NLP-related grunt work in addition to…
      bobbiechen on HN
    • I really want to like this. My points - 1. From the articles I tried, the summaries seem to be very basic. They don't seem to capture the essential points of the articles it is…
      thunderbong on HN
  • Resoomer

    From 1 comment
    • Interesting stuff. Have you succeeded in getting paying customers for such a service? I've seen some similar free alternatives online, i.e. resoomer, smmry
      personjerry on HN
  • Basic word-frequency summarizer algorithms

    From 1 comment
    • Nice landing page. If you Google "summarizer", you will find dozens of similar services for free. The mechanism behind it is very simple. A couple a years ago I built one from…
      blobster on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/22582047)