MockRTC

30points
3comments
#1,256of 2,570 in 2022
Top 49%of 2022 by points

How HN took it

QuietFewer than 5 comments about the project

0 positive, 1 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 0 critical, out of 1 comments about the project.

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

Requests

  • Suggestions for more mock behaviours

    From 1 comment
    • I've _just_ published this package, so all of this is quite new! It lets you define mock behaviour for a WebRTC peer in a couple of lines, and then connect to that mock using…
      pimterry on HN

Questions

  • Why not use the real WebRTC stack with a test-oriented signaling implementation instead of this approach

    From 1 comment
    • Having done a bit of this: wondering why you didn't use the real WebRTC stack with a test-oriented signaling implementation?
      dboreham on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/31272194)