HiFiScan

Creative

audio calibration

SHOW HN2022

260points
103comments
#177of 2,570 in 2022
Top 7%of 2022 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

5 positive, 16 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 8 critical, out of 29 comments about the project. Thread score -0.08.

Idea: 2 for, 3 againstExecution: 0 for, 3 againstPerformance: 1 for, 2 againstPricing: 1 for, 0 againstDocs: 1 for, 0 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Useful for calibrating cheap speakers at zero cost.

    From 2 comments
    • Counter-point: The use case is making relatively-shitty speakers in front of the computer better, and single point in space isn't really that much worse than trying to somehow…
      xani_ on HN
    • So many negative comments here. I for one think this is absolutely fantastic tool to calibrate cheap television and computer speakers so they don't sound like complete crap.…
      127 on HN
  • Could help with headphone and EQ tuning.

    From 1 comment
    • It does however look great for helping me characterize differences in my 3D printed headphone designs. My old resin-printed design has incredibly good bass, and when I changed…
      TaylorAlexander on HN

Objections

  • Room correction is a bandaid; proper room treatment matters more.

    From 2 comments
    • I'm not an audiophile in the obsessive-compulsive sense, but I've been recording music in my home studio for 20 years and I know my way around it. This sort of calibration is not…
      IAmGraydon on HN
    • This type of software, is just a bandaid and really doesn't work very well (though it can work better with headphones). Properly thought out and tuned acoustic work is what is…
      timc3 on HN
  • Results depend heavily on the measurement microphone's accuracy.

    From 2 comments
    • You'd also be relying very heavily on the microphone used to measure it.
      drcongo on HN
    • That's the 'device with an imperfect response curve', I assume. In fairness, the readme does state: > A good microphone is needed, with a wide frequency range and preferably with…
      OJFord on HN
  • Frequency response changes with volume, so one correction may not hold.

    From 1 comment
    • I’ve tried this for my speaker setup. And the problem is that the frequency response is a function of volume. For example, the louder I play music the more the bass is…
      runeks on HN

Requests

  • Support for better microphones and calibration files.

    From 2 comments
    • Commercial systems that do this kind of room correction generally have a limited range of recommended microphones, and the more expensive (and hopefully better) ones will have…
      rodgerd on HN
    • > A good microphone is needed What qualifies as good enough? Is it worth trying with consumer mics like the ones built ins on phones and laptops?
      tambourine_man on HN
  • Phase and nonlinear distortion correction.

    From 1 comment
    • I think it would be cool to make a more advanced version that corrects for many types of nonlinearities: amplifier distortion and mechanical parts resonating badly.
      etaioinshrdlu on HN

Questions

  • How does it compare to Dirac Live or REW?

    From 2 comments
    • How does this compare to dirac?
      LeSaucy on HN
    • I wonder what are the differences between this tool and industry standard REW app - https://www.roomeqwizard.com/
      zihotki on HN
  • Can consumer microphones be used?

    From 2 comments
    • > A good microphone is needed What qualifies as good enough? Is it worth trying with consumer mics like the ones built ins on phones and laptops?
      tambourine_man on HN
    • Newbie question: how do we know we can trust the microphone? It sounds like a chicken-and-egg problem to equalize speakers with an equalized microphone, but maybe microphones are…
      qbonnard on HN

Alternatives named

  • Dirac Live

    From 2 comments
    • Have you tried Dirac Live? Particularly with a receiver that supports their Bass Control feature? My NAD receiver only supports regular Dirac Live and it's still much, much…
      thirdsun on HN
    • How does this compare to dirac?
      LeSaucy on HN
  • Sonarworks

    From 2 comments
    • I'm using the commercial https://www.sonarworks.com/soundid-reference and it's amazing. I'd say the worse your setup (especially your room) the more magic it does. I did it…
      anotheryou on HN
    • This type of software, is just a bandaid and really doesn't work very well (though it can work better with headphones). Properly thought out and tuned acoustic work is what is…
      timc3 on HN
  • Room EQ Wizard (REW)

    From 1 comment
    • I wonder what are the differences between this tool and industry standard REW app - https://www.roomeqwizard.com/
      zihotki on HN
  • DRC-FIR

    From 1 comment
    • There is an older project with better math inside: http://drc-fir.sourceforge.net/ For starters, it doesn't try to achieve a phase-neutral response, because a phase-neutral…
      patrakov on HN
  • Sonos Trueplay

    From 1 comment
    • Asking because I'm not smart enough: Is this kinda similar to what the Sonos Trueplay feature does? (Where you move your phone, and/or a mic-enabled speaker itself, around the…
      solardev on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/32798891)