nokode

AI

llm experiment

SHOW HN2025

Legend

nokode

Why write code if the LLM can just do the thing? (web app experiment)

github.com

#llm as runtime#no-code web app#llm backend#ai experiment

436points
324comments
#102of 3,837 in 2025
Top 3%of 2025 by points

How HN took it

MixedNo clear lean

22 positive, 42 neutral or asking, 4 mixed, 60 critical, out of 128 comments about the project. Thread score -0.26.

Idea: 19 for, 34 againstPerformance: 0 for, 8 againstDesign: 0 for, 6 againstPrivacy: 0 for, 6 againstExecution: 0 for, 5 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Creative, thought-provoking experiment

    From 3 comments
    • This is amazing. It very creatively emphasizes how our definition of "boilerplate code" will shift over time. Another layer of abstraction would be running N of these, sandboxed,…
      finnborge on HN
    • This demo is pretty great, I love it! And it reminded me a little about NeuralOS, which appeared here a couple months ago [1]. NeuralOS is different though as they decided to…
      cookiengineer on HN
    • Amazing. This is the Internet moment of AI. The Internet took something that used to be slow, cumbersome, expensive and made it fast, efficient, cheap. Now we are doing it again.
      ares623 on HN
  • Works surprisingly well despite slowness

    From 1 comment
    • "It works. That's annoying." Indeed! Would be cooler if support for local llms was added. Currently only has support for anthropic and openai.…
      attogram on HN

Objections

  • Too slow and expensive to be practical

    From 3 comments
    • It's orders of magnitude cheaper to serve requests with conventional methods than directly with LLM. My back-of-envelope calculation says, optimistically, it takes more than 100…
      ychen306 on HN
    • Calculation is $0.05/request is valid only as far as AI companies continue to burn money as they are in grab the market phase. Once the dust settles prices will go up. Even if…
      ozim on HN
    • With no routes, no controllers, no business logic, how can the capability exist? These are the core components of a web app and require extensive coding. I know we might…
      pyeri on HN
  • Non-deterministic behavior is bad for users and APIs

    From 2 comments
    • The question posed sounds like "why should we have deterministic behavior if we can have non-deterministic behavior instead?" Am I wrong to think that the answer is obvious? I…
      sunaurus on HN
    • I can't wait to build against an API whose outputs can radically change by the second! Usually I have to wait for the company running the API to push breaking changes without…
      julianlam on HN
  • Serious security and prompt injection risks

    From 4 comments
    • Generating code will always be more performant and reliable than this. Just consider the security implications of this design...
      brokensegue on HN
    • Exactly. It even includes built-in prompt injection as a "feedback form".
      samrolken on HN
    • You can build this today exactly as efficiently as you can when inference is 1000x faster, because the only things you can build with this is things that absolutely don't matter.…
      DanHulton on HN
    • The fatal problem with LLM-as-runtime-club isn’t performance. It’s ops (especially security). When the god rectangle fails, there is literally nobody on earth who can even…
      hyko on HN

Requests

  • Support local LLMs

    From 1 comment
    • "It works. That's annoying." Indeed! Would be cooler if support for local llms was added. Currently only has support for anthropic and openai.…
      attogram on HN
  • Cache or convert generated code for speed and consistency

    From 3 comments
    • If you added a few more tools that let the LLM modify code files that would directly serve requests, that would significantly speed up future responses and also ensure…
      Finbarr on HN
    • This is incredibly interesting. Now what if you ask it to optimize itself? Instead of just: ``` prompt: `Handle this HTTP request: ${method} ${path}`, ``` Append some simple…
      crazygringo on HN
    • Wouldn't be the trick to let AI code the app on first requests and then let it run the code instead of have it always generate everything? This should combine the best of both…
      thibran on HN

Questions

  • Why use a small Haiku model

    From 1 comment
  • How can the capability exist without routes or business logic

    From 1 comment
    • With no routes, no controllers, no business logic, how can the capability exist? These are the core components of a web app and require extensive coding. I know we might…
      pyeri on HN

Alternatives named

  • Claude Imagine

    From 1 comment
    • This reminds me of the recent Claude Imagine, which passed quietly through most people's radars, but let you create web interfaces of any kind on the fly. There was no JS code…
      taylorlunt on HN
  • autoapp

    From 1 comment
    • Wrote a similar PoC here: https://github.com/s1liconcow/autoapp Some ideas - use a slower 'design' model at startup to generate the initial app theme and DB schema and a 'fast'…
      siliconc0w on HN
  • NeuralOS

    From 1 comment
    • This demo is pretty great, I love it! And it reminded me a little about NeuralOS, which appeared here a couple months ago [1]. NeuralOS is different though as they decided to…
      cookiengineer on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/45783640)