Alarmism.watch

Other

fact checking

SHOW HN2020

16points
23comments
#1,896of 3,028 in 2020
Top 63%of 2020 by points

How HN took it

RoastedHalf or more of the comments are critical

2 positive, 0 neutral or asking, 2 mixed, 10 critical, out of 14 comments about the project. Thread score -0.50.

Execution: 1 for, 4 againstIdea: 1 for, 2 againstDocs: 0 for, 2 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 againstDesign: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Good idea and fun to use

    From 2 comments
    • Not sitting well with the HN hive mind, but I love it. Thanks for a fun and well-executed idea. I predict this comment will be at -4 points by 10am PST 9/2/2020!
      tomcam on HN
    • The idea behind this is brilliant, and I support the sentiment. Unfortunately, for this to work effectively, you really need to be accurate and precise. As others pointed out, a…
      mekkkkkk on HN

Objections

  • Verdicts are vague, with timeframes and claims that are hard to evaluate

    From 3 comments
    • This seems to have a problem of assuming the timeframe for the fulfillment of vague claims. For example, if the claim: "U.N. Predicts entire nations could be wiped-off if Global…
      rhn_mk1 on HN
    • Some of these are a little odd. You classify the "Coronavirus pandemic could cause 40 million deaths if left unchecked" as false, with the explanation that though we're still in…
      autophagian on HN
    • > If you're making a claim that we are in an economic bubble, you can't claim victory if there's a stock market crash after twenty years. What's the timeframe then? If you are…
      rhn_mk1 on HN
  • Many Failed verdicts lack sources or cite think tanks

    From 2 comments
    • Very interesting. However many "Failed" lack of sources. The links used as proof are usually Think Tank which are far from objectives about information.
      CiTyBear on HN
    • The idea behind this is brilliant, and I support the sentiment. Unfortunately, for this to work effectively, you really need to be accurate and precise. As others pointed out, a…
      mekkkkkk on HN
  • Some verdicts are inaccurate, such as the Siberian climate date and the 40 million deaths claim

    From 2 comments
    • At least make things accurate: The claim 'Britain to have Siberian climate in 20 years' was made in 2004 (according to the table) and its status is 'failed'. Last time I checked…
      mosselman on HN
    • Some of these are a little odd. You classify the "Coronavirus pandemic could cause 40 million deaths if left unchecked" as false, with the explanation that though we're still in…
      autophagian on HN
  • Binary failed status does not show percentage progress

    From 1 comment
    • Think this should show the status as a percentage of the predicted value, not a boolean "failed". 99% would still be marked here as Failed?
      roelb on HN

Requests

  • Add more examples of correct alarmist predictions

    From 1 comment
    • The list ought to include more of the correct instances of alarmism, and there are plenty to choose from. As they were semi-predictable events (aside from the exact year and…
      bluquark on HN
  • Clearer labels for links and sources

    From 1 comment
    • This seems to have a problem of assuming the timeframe for the fulfillment of vague claims. For example, if the claim: "U.N. Predicts entire nations could be wiped-off if Global…
      rhn_mk1 on HN

Questions

  • What timeframe is used for vague predictions

    From 2 comments
    • > If you're making a claim that we are in an economic bubble, you can't claim victory if there's a stock market crash after twenty years. What's the timeframe then? If you are…
      rhn_mk1 on HN
    • This seems to have a problem of assuming the timeframe for the fulfillment of vague claims. For example, if the claim: "U.N. Predicts entire nations could be wiped-off if Global…
      rhn_mk1 on HN

Alternatives named

  • Longbets

    From 1 comment
    • More specific claims have been made and held accountable at http://longbets.com.
      tomcdonnell on HN
  • Politifact and Snopes

    From 1 comment
    • Agreed. Your assessments are at least as commonsensical as Politifact, Snopes, etc.
      tomcam on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/24350217)