OpenObserve

Infrastructure

observability monitoring

SHOW HN2023

198points
97comments
#281of 3,109 in 2023
Top 10%of 2023 by points

How HN took it

CuriousMostly questions and neutral comments

9 positive, 25 neutral or asking, 1 mixed, 7 critical, out of 42 comments about the project. Thread score +0.01.

Idea: 2 for, 1 againstDocs: 0 for, 3 againstPerformance: 2 for, 0 againstExecution: 1 for, 1 againstPricing: 0 for, 1 against

The thread, comment by comment

Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.

positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker

What HN said

What people liked

  • Easy single-binary setup with low resource usage

    From 2 comments
    • Hah, funny to see this on HN, I just tried this 3 days ago when I saw it being discussed on /r/selfhosted. As someone running a homelab, and hadn't set up logging yet, it was a…
      gettodachoppa on HN
    • VictoriaMetrics core developer here. OpenObserve looks very promising from the first sight! It prioritizes the same properties as VictoriaMetrics products: - Easy setup and…
      valyala on HN
  • Low storage cost versus Elasticsearch

    From 1 comment
    • It seems that the 140x lower storage cost comes from: 1. S3 (OO) vs EBS (ES): about 5x 2. No indexing: About 10x ? 3. No data duplication (due to using S3 I assume) in HA…
      aliencat on HN

Objections

  • Documentation unclear on ingestion agents and metrics/traces support

    From 2 comments
    • Was excited about this as I've been looking to host my own DataDog substitute for aggregating logs, alerts, searches, metrics, etc. Wanted to give this a shot but unfortunately…
      asnyder on HN
    • I poked around the user guide[0] and discovered this: > Currently OpenObserve support steams of type logs, in future streams types metrics & traces will be supported. - are…
      hamandcheese on HN
  • Elasticsearch API compatibility behind a commercial license

    From 1 comment
    • Looked at this a couple of days ago and it looks impressive! However, it does saddens me to see the elasticsearch api compatibility being behind a license, I had hoped this was…
      makkesk8 on HN
  • Kibana not supported despite drop-in replacement claim

    From 1 comment
    • > It is a drop-in replacement for Elasticsearch if you are just ingesting data using APIs and searching using kibana (Kibana is not supported nor required with OpenObserve.…
      michaelmior on HN

Requests

  • Kibana support

    From 2 comments
    • Said an alternate way, if Kibana drop in compat could be a thing, it would be easier for infra teams to do it as a drop in into existing stacks at bigger companies which makes it…
      vlovich123 on HN
    • >Is Kibana support totally out of the question? Actually no. We already have a good amount of pieces in place to support kibana. 2-3 weeks of dev work and it will be ready. Just…
      prabhatsharma on HN
  • SSO/SCIM/Okta support

    From 1 comment
    • How long until you have SSO/SCIM/IDP support? Being able to provision and manage users and sign in via Okta will be really useful.
      adamm255 on HN
  • OTLP support for logs and metrics

    From 1 comment
    • According to the docs you only have OpenTelemetry ingest support for traces, but not metrics and logs. Is that right?
      quickquest234 on HN
  • Helm chart and benchmarks against Loki

    From 2 comments
    • Might I suggest a Helm chart so that people can just apply it/install it to their home test k8s cluster, etc.
      MuffinFlavored on HN
    • Do you have any benchmark tests with Loki?
      safeie on HN

Questions

  • How it compares to Grafana stack, Signoz and Parseable

    From 3 comments
    • What differentiates you from the grafana stack? Grafana labs now have solutions for every pillar of observability (metrics, logs, traces), and that whole stack also touts cheap…
      hamandcheese on HN
    • How are you different from something like Signoz ?
      codegeek on HN
    • How does this compare to Parseable? https://github.com/parseablehq/parseable First guess is that the underlying storage / query layer is pretty similar (Parquet + Datafusion),…
      benpacker on HN
  • Whether metrics and traces are queryable yet

    From 1 comment
    • I poked around the user guide[0] and discovered this: > Currently OpenObserve support steams of type logs, in future streams types metrics & traces will be supported. - are…
      hamandcheese on HN

Alternatives named

  • Grafana Loki/Mimir/Tempo stack

    From 1 comment
    • What differentiates you from the grafana stack? Grafana labs now have solutions for every pillar of observability (metrics, logs, traces), and that whole stack also touts cheap…
      hamandcheese on HN
  • Datadog

    From 1 comment
    • Once I wanted to use Data dog with our internal project. Unfortunately I couldn't use the trial, it ended when I was ill at home. So I asked to prolong the trial. Ohhh that was a…
      gitowiec on HN
  • SigNoz

    From 1 comment
  • Parseable

    From 1 comment
    • How does this compare to Parseable? https://github.com/parseablehq/parseable First guess is that the underlying storage / query layer is pretty similar (Parquet + Datafusion),…
      benpacker on HN
  • VictoriaMetrics

    From 1 comment
    • VictoriaMetrics core developer here. OpenObserve looks very promising from the first sight! It prioritizes the same properties as VictoriaMetrics products: - Easy setup and…
      valyala on HN

Category, keywords, summaries and labels on this page were made by AI (Thread Reader v2) and not checked by hand. Each point links to the comments it came from.

Add a badge to your READMEShown on HackerShow
[![Shown on HackerShow](https://hackershow.org/badge.svg)](https://hackershow.org/show/36280028)