Did
Infrastructure
decentralized network
SHOW HN2023
8points
7comments
#2,671of 3,109 in 2023
Top 86%of 2023 by points
How HN took it
QuietFewer than 5 comments about the project
0 positive, 1 neutral or asking, 0 mixed, 2 critical, out of 3 comments about the project.
Idea: 0 for, 2 against
The thread, comment by comment
Each row is a top-level comment and its replies, in HN's order. Select a cell to open that comment on HN.
positive neutral or mixed critical about another commenter or something else the maker
What HN said
Objections
Name collides with the W3C DID (decentralized identifier) standard
From 2 comments
Unfortunate choice of name, given https://www.w3.org/TR/did-core/.
dc396 on HNaside from squatting on the existing DID name, this smells an awful lot like the related AT protocol; how does your effort differ?
mdaniel on HN
Looks very similar to the AT protocol
From 1 comment
aside from squatting on the existing DID name, this smells an awful lot like the related AT protocol; how does your effort differ?
mdaniel on HN
Requests
Explain how it differs from the AT protocol and whether they are interoperable
From 1 comment
Ok, well, I would bet that any consumer of your newfound protocol and its DID-but-not-that-DID system will still value knowing how yours differs from the AT protocol, and extra…
mdaniel on HN
Questions
How does this differ from the AT protocol?
From 1 comment
aside from squatting on the existing DID name, this smells an awful lot like the related AT protocol; how does your effort differ?
mdaniel on HN
Alternatives named
AT protocol
From 1 comment
aside from squatting on the existing DID name, this smells an awful lot like the related AT protocol; how does your effort differ?
mdaniel on HN